Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001;2001(2):CD002803.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002803.

Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients

I Kwan  1 , F Bunn, I Roberts
Affiliations

Spinal immobilisation for trauma patients

I Kwan et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001.

Abstract

Background: Spinal immobilisation involves the use of a number of devices and strategies to stabilise the spinal column after injury and thus prevent spinal cord damage. The practice is widely recommended and widely used in trauma patients with suspected spinal cord injury in the pre-hospital setting.

Objectives: To quantify the effect of different methods of spinal immobilisation (including immobilisation versus no immobilisation) on mortality, neurological disability, spinal stability and adverse effects in trauma patients.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register (CCTR), the specialised register of the Cochrane Injuries Group, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and the National Research Register. We checked reference lists of all articles and contacted experts in the field to identify eligible trials. Manufacturers of spinal immobilisation devices were also contacted for information.

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients with suspected spinal cord injury. Trials in healthy volunteers were excluded.

Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria to trial reports and extracted data.

Main results: We found no randomised controlled trials of spinal immobilisation strategies in trauma patients.

Reviewer's conclusions: We did not find any randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. The effect of spinal immobilisation on mortality, neurological injury, spinal stability and adverse effects in trauma patients remains uncertain. Because airway obstruction is a major cause of preventable death in trauma patients, and spinal immobilisation, particularly of the cervical spine, can contribute to airway compromise, the possibility that immobilisation may increase mortality and morbidity cannot be excluded. Large prospective studies are needed to validate the decision criteria for spinal immobilisation in trauma patients with high risk of spinal injury. Randomised controlled trials in trauma patients are required to establish the relative effectiveness of alternative strategies for spinal immobilisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None known.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies excluded from this review

Black 1998 {published data only}
    1. Black CA, Buderer NMF, Blaylock B, Hogan BJ. Comparative study of risk factors for skin breakdown with cervial orthotic devices: Philadelphia and Aspen. Journal of Trauma Nursing 1998;5(3):62‐6. - PubMed
Chan 1996 {published data only}
    1. Chan D, Goldberg RM, Mason J, Chan L. Backboard versus mattress splint immobiliszation: a comparison of symptoms generated. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1996;14(3):293‐8. - PubMed
Cline 1985 {published data only}
    1. Cline JR, Scheidel E, Bigsby EF. A comparison of methods of cervical immobilization used in patient extrication and transport. Journal of Trauma 1985;25(7):649‐53. - PubMed
Cordell 1995 {published data only}
    1. Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, Stroman SJ, Nelson DR. Pain and tissue‐interface pressures during spine‐board immobilization. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1995;26(1):31‐6. - PubMed
Delbridge 1993 {published data only}
    1. Delbridge TR, Auble TE, Garrison HG, Menegazzi JJ. Discomfort in healthy volunteers immobilized on wooden backboards and vacuum mattress splints. Prehospital & Disaster Medicine 1993;8(3 Suppl):S63.
Graziano 1987 {published data only}
    1. Graziano AF, Scheidel EA, Cline JR, Baer LJ. A radiographic comparison of prehospital cervical immobilization methods. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1987;16(10):1127‐31. - PubMed
Hamilton 1996 {published data only}
    1. Hamilton RS, Pons PT. The efficacy and comfort of full‐body vacuum splints for cervical‐spine immobilization. Journal of Emergency Medicine 1996;14(5):553‐9. - PubMed
Hauswald 2000 {published data only}
    1. Hauswald M, Hsu M, Stockoff C. Maximising comfort and minimizing ischemia: a comparison of four methods of spinal immobilisation. Prehospital Emergency Care 2000;4:250‐2. - PubMed
Jedlicka 1999 {published data only}
    1. Jedlicka DS. A comparison of the effects of two methods of spinal immobilization on respiratory effort in the older adult. Dissertation Abstracts International 1999;58‐05B:2354.
Johnson 1996 {published data only}
    1. Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 1996;14(4):369‐72. - PubMed
Lerner 1998 {published data only}
    1. Lerner EB, Billittier AJ 4th, Moscati RM. The effects of neutral positioning with and without padding on spinal immobilization of healthy subjects. Prehospital Emergency Care 1998;2(2):112‐6. - PubMed
Lunsford 1994 {published data only}
    1. Lunsford TR, Davidson M, Lunsford BR. The effectiveness of four contemporary cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 1994;6(4):93‐9.
Manix 1995a {published data only}
    1. Manix T, Gunderson MR, Garth GC. Comparison of prehospital cervical immobilization devices using video and electromyography. Prehospital Disaster Medicine 1995;10(4):232‐8. - PubMed
Manix 1995b {published data only}
    1. Manix T. How effective are body‐to‐board strapping techniques?. Journal of Emergency Medical Services 1995;20(6):44‐50. - PubMed
Mazolewski 1994 {published data only}
    1. Mazolewski P, Manix T. The effectiveness of strapping techniques in spinal immobilization. Annals of Emergency Medicine 1994;23(6):1290‐5. - PubMed
Perry 1999 {published data only}
    1. Perry SD, McLellan B, McIlroy WE, Maki BE, Schwartz M, Fernie GR. The efficacy of head immobilization techniques during simulated vehicle motion. Spine 1999;24(17):1839‐44. - PubMed
Totten 1999 {published data only}
    1. Totten VY, Sugarman DB. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehospital Emergency Care 1999;3(4):347‐52. - PubMed
Walton 1995 {published data only}
    1. Walton R, DeSalva JF, Ernst AA, Shahane A. Padded vs unpadded spine board for cervical spine immobilization. Academic Emergency Medicine 1995;2(8):725‐8. - PubMed

Additional references

ACS 1997
    1. American College of Surgeons. Advanced trauma Life Support Program for Doctors. 6th Edition. Chicago: American College of Surgeons, 1997.
Advanced LS 1993
    1. Advanced LS. Advanced Paediatric Life Support. Vol. 1st edn, London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1993.
Altman 1996
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Detecting skewness from summary information. BMJ 1996;313:1200. - PMC - PubMed
Burney 1993
    1. Burney RE, Maio RF, Maynard F, Karunas R. Incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of spinal cord injury at trauma centers in North America. Archives of Surgery 1993;128:596‐9. - PubMed
Butman 1996
    1. Butman A, Schelble DT, Vomacka RW. The relevance of the occult cervical spine controversy and mechanism of injury to prehospital protocols: a review of the issues and literature. Prehospital Disaster Medicine 1996;11:228‐33. - PubMed
Davies 1996
    1. Davies G, Deakin A, Wilson A. The effect of a rigid collar on intracranial pressure. Injury 1996;27(9):647‐9. - PubMed
Davis 1993
    1. Davis JW, Phreaner DL, Hoyt DB, Mackersie RC. The etiology of missed spine injuries. Journal of Trauma 1993;34(3):342‐6. - PubMed
Domeier 1999
    1. Domeier RM. NAEMSP Position Paper: Indications for prehospital spinal immobilisation. Prehospital Emergency Care 1999;3:251‐3. - PubMed
Hauswald 1998
    1. Hauswald M, Ong G, Tandberg D, Omar Z. Out‐of‐hospital spinal immobilisation: its effect on neurologic injury. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5(3):214‐9. - PubMed
Hewitt 1994
    1. Hewitt S. Skin necrosis caused by a semi‐rigid cervical collar in a ventilated patient with multiple injuries. Injury 1994;25:323‐4. - PubMed
Hoffman 2000
    1. Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, Todd KH, Zucker M. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. New England Journal of Medicine 2000;343:94‐9. - PubMed
Houghton 1996
    1. Houghton DJ, Curley JW. Dysphagia caused by a hard cervical collar. British Journal of Neurosurgery 1996;10:501‐2. - PubMed
McHugh 1998
    1. McHugh TP, Taylor JP. Unnecessary out‐of‐hospital use of full spinal immobilsation. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5:278‐80. - PubMed
Miller 1994
    1. Miller TR, et al. Costs of head and neck injury and a cost‐benefit analysis of bicycle helmets. In: Levine RS editor(s). Head and Neck Injury. New York: Society of Automotive Engineering, 1994:211‐40.
Orledge 1998
    1. Orledge JD, Pepe PE. Out‐of‐hospital Spinal Immobilization: Is It Really Necessary?. Academic Emergency Medicine 1998;5(3):203‐4. - PubMed
Schulz 1995
    1. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman D. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association 1995;273(5):408‐12. - PubMed
SCI Center 1998
    1. The National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. Spinal cord Injury: facts and figures at a glance. Birmingham, Alabama: University of Alabama at Birmingham National Spinal Injury Center, 1998.
Wang 1990
    1. Wang D, Wu X, Shi G, Wang Y. China's first total care unit for the spinal cord injured. Paraplegia 1990;28:318‐20. - PubMed

Publication types