Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jun;184(7):1325-9; discussion 1329-31.
doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.115119.

Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix?

Affiliations

Does cervical cerclage prevent preterm delivery in patients with a short cervix?

S S Hassan et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to determine whether cerclage placement in women with a short cervix on transvaginal ultrasonography reduces the rate of preterm delivery.

Study design: A retrospective cohort study identified patients with an ultrasonographic short cervix (cervical length < or =15 mm) between 14 and 24 weeks' gestation. Cerclage placement was performed at the discretion of the attending physician. Clinical characteristics and outcome with and without cerclage were compared.

Results: Seventy patients met inclusion criteria; 25 (36%) underwent cerclage placement. Patients managed with cerclage had a lower gestational age at diagnosis (19.6 weeks vs 21.3 weeks, P <.01) but had a similar median cervical length, presence of funneling, and a history of cervical surgery, in comparison with those managed without cerclage. The rate of spontaneous preterm delivery was not different between groups. Patients with cerclage had a higher rate of preterm premature rupture of membranes than those without cerclage (65.2% vs 36.4%, P <.05).

Conclusion: Cervical cerclage in patients with a short cervix did not reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm delivery and increased the risk of preterm premature rupture of membranes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Poor design in cerclage studies.
    Harger JH. Harger JH. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;186(3):594-5; author reply 595-6. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.120283. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11904632 No abstract available.