Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery
- PMID: 11410068
- DOI: 10.1021/ci000403i
Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery
Abstract
Using a simple model of ligand-receptor interactions, the interactions between ligands and receptors of varying complexities are studied and the probabilities of binding calculated. It is observed that as the systems become more complex the chance of observing a useful interaction for a randomly chosen ligand falls dramatically. The implications of this for the design of combinatorial libraries is explored. A large set of drug leads and optimized compounds is profiled using several different properties relevant to molecular recognition. The changes observed for these properties during the drug optimization phase support the hypothesis that less complex molecules are more common starting points for the discovery of drugs. An extreme example of the use of simple molecules for directed screening against thrombin is provided.
Similar articles
-
Library design and virtual screening using multiple 4-point pharmacophore fingerprints.Pac Symp Biocomput. 2000:576-87. doi: 10.1142/9789814447331_0055. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2000. PMID: 10902205
-
Revisiting de novo drug design: receptor based pharmacophore screening.Curr Top Med Chem. 2014;14(16):1890-8. doi: 10.2174/1568026614666140929115506. Curr Top Med Chem. 2014. PMID: 25262804 Review.
-
Design of libraries to explore receptor sites.J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1999 Jan-Feb;39(1):46-50. doi: 10.1021/ci980104h. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1999. PMID: 10094612
-
Computer-aided drug design and virtual screening of targeted combinatorial libraries of mixed-ligand transition metal complexes of 2-butanone thiosemicarbazone.Comput Biol Chem. 2018 Aug;75:178-195. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 May 8. Comput Biol Chem. 2018. PMID: 29883916
-
Molecular complexity and fragment-based drug discovery: ten years on.Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011 Aug;15(4):489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2011.05.008. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2011. PMID: 21665521 Review.
Cited by
-
Badapple: promiscuity patterns from noisy evidence.J Cheminform. 2016 May 28;8:29. doi: 10.1186/s13321-016-0137-3. eCollection 2016. J Cheminform. 2016. PMID: 27239230 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between hot spot residues and ligand binding hot spots in protein-protein interfaces.J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Aug 27;52(8):2236-44. doi: 10.1021/ci300175u. Epub 2012 Jul 24. J Chem Inf Model. 2012. PMID: 22770357 Free PMC article.
-
Fragment-based screening for inhibitors of PDE4A using enthalpy arrays and X-ray crystallography.J Biomol Screen. 2012 Apr;17(4):469-80. doi: 10.1177/1087057111430987. Epub 2012 Jan 5. J Biomol Screen. 2012. PMID: 22223051 Free PMC article.
-
The consequences of translational and rotational entropy lost by small molecules on binding to proteins.J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002 Oct;16(10):741-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1022446720849. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002. PMID: 12650591
-
Docking screens: right for the right reasons?Curr Top Med Chem. 2009;9(9):755-70. doi: 10.2174/156802609789207091. Curr Top Med Chem. 2009. PMID: 19754393 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources