[Do the new criteria of the American Diabetes Association lead to earlier diagnosis of type-2 diabetes mellitus?]
- PMID: 11412573
- PMCID: PMC7681725
- DOI: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78890-7
[Do the new criteria of the American Diabetes Association lead to earlier diagnosis of type-2 diabetes mellitus?]
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the period of time between the first occasional fasting hyperglycaemia (OFH) and the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria or the American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria.
Design: Retrospective, observational study.
Setting: Urban primary care centre.
Subjects: 104 patients with DM2 diagnosed between 1991 and 1995 who had a previous OFH.
Measurements: Age, gender and other risk factors, dates of the first OFH (fasting plasma glucose >= 110 mg/dl), the diagnosis according to WHO criteria (2 fasting plasma glucose >= 140 mg/dl or >= 200 mg/dl two hours after the oral glucose test tolerance (OGTT)) or with the ADA criteria (2 fasting plasma glucose >= 126 mg/dl), and the intervals in months between them.
Results: Of the 222 diagnosed patients, 104 (47%) had previous OFH. Age at diagnosis was 60.8 (SD 10.1) and 53% were women. OGTT was performed in 51 cases (49%). The median (range) of the interval between the first OFH and diagnosis was 16 months (0-101) for those who were undertaken an OGTT, and 45 months (1-104) for those who were not (p = 0.003). In these last ones, ADA criteria reduced the interval to 31 months (0-97) (p < 0.001). In 27 of these patients who did not satisfy both criteria at the same time, ADA criteria reduced the interval to 10 months (0-93) (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: Not performing the OGTT means a delay in diagnosis which can be countered by applying the ADA criteria.
Objetivo: Analizar el intervalo temporal entre la primera hiperglucemia basal ocasional (HBO) y el diagnóstico de diabetes mellitus tipo 2 (DM2) al aplicar los criterios de la OMS y de la Asociación Americana de Diabetes (ADA).
Diseño: Estudio observacional, retrospectivo. Ámbito del estudio. Centro de atención primaria urbano.
Sujetos: Un total de 104 pacientes con DM2, diagnosticados entre 1991 y 1995, con antecedentes de HBO.
Mediciones o intervenciones: Edad, género y otros factores de riesgo, fechas de la primera HBO (glucemia basal 3 110 mg/dl), del diagnóstico según criterios OMS (2 glucemias basales 3 140 mg/dl o 3 200 mg/dl a las 2 horas de la sobrecarga oral de glucosa [SOG]) y aplicando criterios ADA (2 glucemias basales 3 126 mg/dl) y los intervalos en meses entre ellas.
Resultados: De los 222 pacientes diagnosticados, 104 (47%) presentaban antecedentes de HBO. La edad en el momento del diagnóstico fue 60,8 años (DE, 10,1), siendo un 53% mujeres. En 51 casos (49%) se realizó SOG. La mediana (rango) del intervalo entre la primera HBO y el diagnóstico fue de 16 meses (0–101) en los que se realizó la SOG y de 45 (1–104) en los que no se practicó (p = 0,003). En estos últimos, los criterios ADA lo redujeron a 31 meses (0–97) (p < 0,001) y en 27 de ellos que no cumplían ambos criterios a la vez el intervalo fue de sólo 10 meses (0–93) (p < 0,001). Conclusiones. La no realización de la SOG comporta un retraso en el diagnóstico que puede ser contrarrestado con la aplicación de los criterios de la ADA.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of The World Health Organization (WHO) two-step strategy and OGTT for diabetes mellitus screening.Acta Med Indones. 2004 Jan-Mar;36(1):3-7. Acta Med Indones. 2004. PMID: 15931695
-
Comparison of the diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus, WHO-1985, ADA-1997 and WHO-1999 in the adult population of Asturias (Spain).Diabet Med. 2003 Nov;20(11):904-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01006.x. Diabet Med. 2003. PMID: 14632715
-
Comparison of ADA and WHO criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes in elderly Koreans.Diabet Med. 2002 Oct;19(10):853-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2002.00783.x. Diabet Med. 2002. PMID: 12358874
-
[Gestational diabetes mellitus (Update 2019)].Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019 May;131(Suppl 1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s00508-018-1419-8. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2019. PMID: 30980150 Review. German.
-
Early diagnosis, early treatment and the new diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus.Br J Nutr. 2000 Dec;84 Suppl 2:S177-81. doi: 10.1079/096582197388644. Br J Nutr. 2000. PMID: 11242465 Review.
Cited by
-
[Pre-diabetes in primary care: diagnosis... and treatment?].Aten Primaria. 2006 Apr 30;37(7):400-6. doi: 10.1157/13087385. Aten Primaria. 2006. PMID: 16733022 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish. No abstract available.
-
[What is diabetics' real cardiovascular risk?].Aten Primaria. 2002 Sep 30;30(5):335-6; author's reply 336-7. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79039-2. Aten Primaria. 2002. PMID: 12372219 Free PMC article. Spanish. No abstract available.
-
[Glycated haemoglobin for the diagnosis of diabetes. A universal standard?].Aten Primaria. 2010 Nov;42(11):571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2010.01.016. Epub 2010 Apr 7. Aten Primaria. 2010. PMID: 20378203 Free PMC article. Spanish.
References
-
- King H., Aubert R.E., Herman W.H. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2005. Prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1414–1431. - PubMed
-
- Klein R. Hyperglicemia and microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:258–268. - PubMed
-
- United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group Intensive blood-glucose control with sulfonilureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33) Lancet. 1998;352:837–852. - PubMed
-
- United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34) Lancet. 1998;352:854–864. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials