Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 May;20(5):471-84.
doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(01)00398-7.

[The effects of peridural anesthesia on duration of labor and mode of delivery]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
Review

[The effects of peridural anesthesia on duration of labor and mode of delivery]

[Article in French]
C Aveline et al. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2001 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of epidural analgesia (EA) on the duration of labour and the mode of delivery.

Data sources: A Medline computerised literature research was conducted from 1989 to 2000 including all the prospective studies comparing EA and systemic analgesia during labour.

Data synthesis: EA prolongs the first and second stages of labour and increases the rate of instrumental delivery, without neonatal side effects. EA is not responsible for dystocia and caesarean section rate is not increased by this mode of analgesia. The effect of combined spinal-epidural analgesia is comparable to the one of EA on the length of labour and the mode of delivery. Ropivacaine does not appear to be different from bupivacaine in that setting. The benefit of ambulation remains controversial since it does not reduce the incidence of instrumental delivery, compared to conventional EA with similarly diluted local anaesthetic solutions.

Conclusions: Pain relief provided by EA combined to modification of obstetric management (amniotomy, oxytocin) does not impair the rate of caesarean section and dystocia.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources