Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review
- PMID: 11420271
- PMCID: PMC33389
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effect of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation on clinically relevant outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain.
Design: Systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials.
Participants: A total of 1964 patients with disabling low back pain for more than three months.
Main outcome measures: Pain, function, employment, quality of life, and global assessments.
Results: Ten trials reported on a total of 12 randomised comparisons of multidisciplinary treatment and a control condition. There was strong evidence that intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration improves function when compared with inpatient or outpatient non-multidisciplinary treatments. There was moderate evidence that intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration reduces pain when compared with outpatient non-multidisciplinary rehabilitation or usual care. There was contradictory evidence regarding vocational outcomes of intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial intervention. Some trials reported improvements in work readiness, but others showed no significant reduction in sickness leaves. Less intensive outpatient psychophysical treatments did not improve pain, function, or vocational outcomes when compared with non-multidisciplinary outpatient therapy or usual care. Few trials reported effects on quality of life or global assessments.
Conclusions: The reviewed trials provide evidence that intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration reduces pain and improves function in patients with chronic low back pain. Less intensive interventions did not show improvements in clinically relevant outcomes.
Figures
Comment in
-
Rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Review was of little help in selecting treatment.BMJ. 2001 Nov 24;323(7323):1251-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7323.1251. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11719421 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Vocational rehabilitation. Armed services may provide model.BMJ. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1186-7. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11794252 No abstract available.
References
-
- Badley EM, Rasooly I, Webster GK. Relative importance of musculoskeletal disorders as a cause of chronic health problems, disability, and health care utilization: findings from the 1990 Ontario health survey [see comments] J Rheumatol. 1994;21:505–514. - PubMed
-
- Fishbain DA, Rosomoff HL, Steele-Rosomoff R, Cutler BR. Types of pain treatment facilities and referral selection criteria. A review. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:58–66. - PubMed
-
- Waddell G. Low back pain: a twentieth century health care enigma. Spine. 1996;21:2820–2825. - PubMed
-
- Turk DC, Rudy TE. Towards a comprehensive assessment of chronic pain patients. Behav Res Ther. 1987;25:237–249. - PubMed
-
- Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB. Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions [see comments] Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:376–380. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical