Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jul;85(1):F4-7.
doi: 10.1136/fn.85.1.f4.

Consent to autopsy for neonates

H E McHaffie  1 , P W Fowlie, R Hume, I A Laing, D J Lloyd, A J Lyon
Affiliations

Consent to autopsy for neonates

H E McHaffie et al. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine parents' views on autopsy after treatment withdrawal.

Design: Face to face interviews with 59 sets of bereaved parents (108 individual parents) for whose 62 babies there had been discussion of treatment withdrawal.

Results: All except one couple were asked for permission for postmortem examination; 38% refused. The main reasons for declining were concerns about disfigurement, a wish to have the child left in peace, and a feeling that an autopsy was unnecessary because the parents had no unanswered questions. The diagnosis, the age of the child, and the approach of the consultant appeared to influence consent rates. Of those who agreed to autopsies, 92% were given the results by the neonatologist concerned. Whether or not they had agreed to the procedure, at 13 months no parent expressed regrets about their decision.

Conclusions: Autopsy rates in the East of Scotland stand at 62%. Parents' perceptions are an important element in consent to postmortem examination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. BMJ. 1999 Dec 11;319(7224):1518 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):9 - PubMed
    1. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jan;154(1):38-42 - PubMed
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1982 Sep;136(9):781-4 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1986 Apr;80(4):665-71 - PubMed