Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans
- PMID: 11422593
- DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007697.x
Comparative antimicrobial activities of antiseptic mouthrinses against isogenic planktonic and biofilm forms of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans
Abstract
Background: Bacteria contained in biofilms have been shown to have a decreased susceptibility to antimicrobial agents compared to those in planktonic form. Thus, in vitro biofilm models have been developed for screening oral antimicrobial formulations in an effort to produce findings more predictive of clinical activity. This study compared the antimicrobial activity of three mouthrinse formulations when tested against isogenic strains of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans (Aa), one of which was a clinical isolate which forms tenacious biofilms in vitro and the other of which was a spontaneous variant which always grows planktonically.
Method: Biofilm-forming Aa strains CU1000 and NJ4300, obtained as clinical isolates, and their respective spontaneous planktonic variants, CU1060 and NJ4350, were grown under standard laboratory conditions and exposed for 15 s to either a negative control (phosphate buffered saline [PBS]), an essential-oil containing mouthrinse (Listerine Antiseptic [LA]), an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride-containing mouthrinse (Meridol [M]), or a triclosan and PVM/MA copolymer-containing mouthrinse (Plax [P]). The cells were then washed, serially diluted, plated, and incubated for enumeration of viable bacteria. Colony-forming units (CFU)/ml were log10 transformed and the mouthrinse groups were compared to the PBS group using analysis of variance.
Results: All 3 mouthrinses produced statisically significant 99.99% reductions (p< or =0.0001) in both planktonic strains compared to the PBS control. Effects on the biofilm forms of the organisms were more variable. Exposure to LA produced statistically significant (p< or =0.0001) reductions in strains CU1000 and NJ4300 of 98.20% and 96.47%, respectively, compared to PBS. M and P produced much smaller reductions which were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The results of this study, in which antimicrobial mouthrinses were tested against biofilm-forming and planktonic strains of the same organism, provide a clear demonstration of the resistance to antimicrobial agents conferred by biofilm formation and provide additional support for employing tests using biofilms to more accurately assess the relative activities of antiplaque agents in vitro.
Similar articles
-
Comparative antimicrobial activity of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse in vitro.J Clin Periodontol. 1999 Jul;26(7):474-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.1999.260710.x. J Clin Periodontol. 1999. PMID: 10412853
-
Susceptibilities of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans biofilms to oral antiseptics.J Med Microbiol. 1997 May;46(5):425-9. doi: 10.1099/00222615-46-5-425. J Med Microbiol. 1997. PMID: 9152040
-
Evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of dentifrices on human oral bacteria.J Clin Dent. 2010;21(4):96-100. J Clin Dent. 2010. PMID: 21269037
-
A review of plaque, gingivitis, calculus and caries clinical efficacy studies with a fluoride dentifrice containing triclosan and PVM/MA copolymer.J Clin Dent. 1996;7 Suppl:S1-S14. J Clin Dent. 1996. PMID: 9238866 Review. No abstract available.
-
Anti-plaque agents in the prevention of biofilm-associated oral diseases.Oral Dis. 2003;9 Suppl 1:23-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1601-0825.9.s1.5.x. Oral Dis. 2003. PMID: 12974527 Review.
Cited by
-
Changes in the incidence of periodontal pathogens during long-term monitoring and after application of antibacterial drugs.Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009 Sep;54(5):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s12223-009-0060-3. Epub 2009 Nov 24. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2009. PMID: 19937216
-
Confusion over live/dead stainings for the detection of vital microorganisms in oral biofilms--which stain is suitable?BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jan 11;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-2. BMC Oral Health. 2014. PMID: 24410850 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of azithromycin on a red complex polymicrobial biofilm.J Oral Microbiol. 2017 Jun 16;9(1):1339579. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2017.1339579. eCollection 2017. J Oral Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28748041 Free PMC article.
-
Defining Genetic Fitness Determinants and Creating Genomic Resources for an Oral Pathogen.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jun 30;83(14):e00797-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00797-17. Print 2017 Jul 15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28476775 Free PMC article.
-
Complete Genome Sequence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans Strain CU1000N.Microbiol Resour Announc. 2022 Apr 21;11(4):e0104221. doi: 10.1128/mra.01042-21. Epub 2022 Mar 7. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2022. PMID: 35254109 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources