Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2001 Jun;17(6):466-76.
doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00415.x.

A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics

Affiliations
Free article
Meta-Analysis

A critical appraisal of the use of umbilical artery Doppler ultrasound in high-risk pregnancies: use of meta-analyses in evidence-based obstetrics

H B Westergaard et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: To reanalyze randomized controlled trials on the use of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in high-risk pregnancies and determine which high-risk pregnancies benefit from the use of Doppler velocimetry.

Methods: Searching Medline, the Cochrane Library and Embase we found 13 randomized controlled trials on the use of Doppler velocimetry in high-risk pregnancies. Of these, six included pregnancies with strictly defined suspected intrauterine growth restriction and/or hypertensive disease of pregnancy ('well-defined studies'); the rest included a great variety of high-risk pregnancies ('general risk studies'). The studies were analyzed with particular regard to the heterogeneity and to outcome. Audits of the perinatal deaths reported in the randomized controlled trials were performed by a panel of 32 international experts.

Results: The 'well-defined studies' had a more uniform study design as compared to the 'general risk studies' and they showed a significant reduction in antenatal admissions (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.43-0.72), inductions of labor (0.78; 0.63-0.96), elective deliveries (inductions of labor and elective Cesarean sections) (0.73; 0.61-0.88) and Cesarean sections (0.78; 0.65-0.94). By perinatal audit it was found that more perinatal deaths in the 'well-defined studies' were potentially avoidable by use of Doppler velocimetry ( P < 0.0005) and the rate of avoidable perinatal deaths was higher among controls (50%) than cases (20%) in this group.

Conclusion: The randomized controlled trials on umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry show major differences regarding study design and technical and clinical issues and, therefore, they should not be pooled in a simple meta-analysis. By stratification it was found that only in pregnancies with suspected intrauterine growth restriction and/or hypertensive disease of pregnancy will the use of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry reduce the number of perinatal deaths and unnecessary obstetric interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources