Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Jul;220(1):150-6.
doi: 10.1148/radiology.220.1.r01jl03150.

Portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic and biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension: initial experience

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic and biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension: initial experience

K Yamakado et al. Radiology. 2001 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of portal venous stent placement in patients with pancreatic or biliary neoplasms invading portal veins and causing portal hypertension.

Materials and methods: Thirteen patients underwent portal venous stent placement because of gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8), risk of gastroesophageal varix rupture (n = 4), ascites (n = 4), thrombocytopenia (n = 3), and/or portal venous thrombosis (n = 3). The main portal vein or both the intrahepatic and main portal veins were invaded in six patients (group A). The main portal vein and splanchnic veins were involved in seven patients (group B). Stents were placed across the stenotic (n = 8) or occluded (n = 5) lesions after percutaneous transhepatic portography. Changes in portal venous pressure, stent patency, and survival were evaluated.

Results: Mean portal venous pressure decreased significantly immediately after stent placement, from 24.9 mm Hg +/- 5.9 (SD) to 15.8 mm Hg +/- 4.6 (P <.001). In group A, blood flow through the stent was maintained and the symptoms had subsided at follow-up (mean, 12.5 months). In group B, symptoms were improved in five patients, but the stents were occluded in all but one patient at a mean follow-up of 1.5 months. There was a significant difference in stent patency between the patients with (14%) and those without (100%) splanchnic venous involvement (P <.01).

Conclusion: Stent placement helped to relieve portal hypertension symptoms. Splanchnic venous involvement was associated with worse stent patency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources