Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Jun;15(3):306-15.
doi: 10.1053/jcan.2001.23274.

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of milrinone with dobutamine in patients after cardiac surgery

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of the hemodynamic effects of milrinone with dobutamine in patients after cardiac surgery

R O Feneck et al. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the hemodynamic effects, efficacy, and safety of intravenous milrinone (M), 50 microg/kg during 10 minutes followed by 0.5 microg/kg/min, with intravenous dobutamine (D), 10 to 20 microg/kg/min, in patients with low cardiac output after cardiac surgery.

Design: Randomized, open-label, multicenter study.

Setting: Cardiothoracic surgery departments, operating rooms, and intensive care units in 6 university hospitals.

Participants: Patients (n = 120; 60 per group) after elective cardiac surgery.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Analysis compared the hemodynamics at baseline and the percentage change from baseline during 4 hours of the drug infusion. The incidence of adverse events was recorded. Both groups had low mean (+/- SEM) cardiac indices (M, 1.6 ([0.03] L/min/m(2); D, 1.7 [0.03] L/min/m(2)) in association with adequate mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (M, 13.7 [1.3] mmHg; D, 12.7 [1.9] mmHg) at baseline. Group M had significantly higher systemic arterial pressures and systemic vascular resistances compared with group D; otherwise, the hemodynamics in both groups were comparable. During the study, hemodynamic responses included the following: group D had greater increases in cardiac index (at 1 hour, D = 55%, M = 36%; p < 0.01), heart rate (at 1 hour, D = 35%, M = 10%; p < 0.001), arterial pressures (mean arterial pressure at 1 hour, D = 31%, M = 7%; p < 0.001), and left ventricular stroke work index (at 1 hour, D = 75%, M = 45%; p < 0.05). Group M had greater decreases in mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (at 1 hour, D = -3%, M = -14%; p < 0.05). Comparisons of adverse events showed that dobutamine was associated with a higher incidence of hypertension (D = 40%, M = 13%; p < 0.02) and change of rhythm from sinus to atrial fibrillation (D = 18%, M = 5%; p < 0.04). Milrinone was associated with a higher incidence of sinus bradycardia (D = 2%, M = 13%; p < 0.03).

Conclusions: Milrinone and dobutamine are appropriate and comparable for the pharmacologic treatment of the low- output syndrome after cardiopulmonary bypass.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources