Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Jun;71(6):1964-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02638-8.

Intraaortic balloon pump therapy facilitates posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Intraaortic balloon pump therapy facilitates posterior vessel off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients

K B Kim et al. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Displacement of the heart to expose posterior vessels during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG, or OPCAB) may impair cardiac function. We used the intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively to reduce operative risk and to facilitate posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients with left main coronary artery disease (> 75% stenosis), intractable resting angina, postinfarction angina, left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction < 35%), or unstable angina.

Methods: One hundred and forty-two consecutive patients who underwent multivessel OPCAB including posterior vessel revascularization were studied prospectively. The patients were divided into group I (n = 57), which received preoperative or intraoperative IABP, and group II (n = 85), which did not receive IABP. In group I, there were 34 patients with left main coronary artery disease, 24 patients with intractable resting angina, 8 patients with left ventricular dysfunction, 5 patients with postinfarction angina, and 40 patients with unstable angina. Seven patients received intraoperative IABP support owing to hemodynamic instability during OPCAB.

Results: There was no operative mortality in group I and 1 death in group II. The average number of distal anastomoses was not different between group I and group II (3.4 +/- 0.9 versus 3.5 +/- 0.9, p = not significant). There were no significant differences in the number of posterior vessel anastomoses per patient. There were no differences in ventilator support time, length of stay in the intensive care unit, hospital stay, and morbidity between the two groups. There was one IABP-related complication in group I.

Conclusions: IABP therapy facilitates posterior vessel OPCAB in high-risk patients, and surgical results are comparable with those in lower-risk patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types