Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001;47(7):1241-8.

Pharmacokinetic basis for the efficient and safe use of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11427455
Clinical Trial

Pharmacokinetic basis for the efficient and safe use of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation

M Mourad et al. Clin Chem. 2001.

Abstract

Background: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an effective posttransplantation immunosuppressive agent used in combination with cyclosporin A (CsA) or tacrolimus (Tc). An increase in plasma mycophenolic acid (MPA) has been shown in patients receiving Tc-MMF combination therapy compared with CsA-MMF combination therapy at the same dose of MMF. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) relationship for MPA in kidney transplant patients receiving low-dose MMF (500 mg twice a day) in combination with Tc.

Methods: Adult kidney transplant recipients (n = 51) were included. MPA-PK profiles (blood sampling at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 h after MMF oral dose) were obtained within the first 2 weeks after transplantation, 3 months after grafting, and at every adverse clinical event [side effect or acute rejection (AR)]. All patients received Tc, MMF (500 mg twice a day), and steroids.

Results: Thirty patients (59%) had uneventful outcomes, and 21 patients had 33 episodes of MPA-related side effects; only 3 patients had AR. A total of 78 MPA-PK profiles were obtained. The following PK parameters were increased in the side-effects group compared with the non-side effects group: mean MPA c(min), 2.63 +/- 1.58 vs 1.75 +/- 0.82 mg/L (P = 0.016); mean c(30), 10.47 +/- 6.27 vs 7.66 +/- 8.95 mg/L (P = 0.009); mean c(60), 9.67 +/- 5.42 vs 5.83 +/- 2.6 mg/L (P = 0.0002); mean area under the MPA time-concentration curve from 0 to 12 h [MPA-AUC((0-12))], 48.38 +/- 18.5 vs 36.04 +/- 10.82 mg. h/L (P = 0.0006); mean dose-normalized MPA-AUC, 0.16 +/- 0.05 vs 0.12 +/- 0.04 (mg. h/L)/(mg/m(2)) (P = 0.0015). For the three AR patients, MPA concentrations obtained at the time of AR revealed MPA c(min) values of 1.86, 1.76, and 3.83 mg/L, respectively, and MPA-AUC((0-12)) values of 37.7, 24.9, and 104.9 mg. h/L. The threshold of toxicity was 3 mg/L (sensitivity, 38.7%; specificity, 91.5%) for c(min), 8.09 mg/L for maximum MPA concentration during the first hour (sensitivity, 77.8%; specificity, 67.4%), and 37.6 mg. h/L for MPA-AUC((0-12)) (sensitivity, 83.3%; specificity, 59.6%).

Conclusions: These results demonstrate the relationship between plasma MPA concentrations and toxicity. High c(min), c(30), and c(60) values as well as AUC((0-12)) are associated with increased risk for side effects. These values may have an importance in a routine monitoring program.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources