A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation
- PMID: 11433048
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.1.13
A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) would decrease extubation failure compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm infants being ventilated for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS).
Methods: Infants who were </=34 weeks' gestational age and who were ventilated for RDS were randomized to either SNIPPV or NCPAP after extubation. The criteria for extubation were peak inspiratory pressure of </=16 cm H(2)O, positive end expiratory pressure of </=5 cm H(2)O, intermittent mandatory ventilation rate of 15 to 25, and fraction of inspired oxygen </=0.35. Pulmonary function tests (PFT) were obtained before extubation. After extubation, blood gases were monitored for a minimum of 72 hours. Success was defined as remaining in the selected mode of treatment or demonstrating improvement (switching to oxyhood/nasal cannula/room air) by 72 hours.
Results: Thirty-two (94%) of 34 infants were extubated successfully with the use of SNIPPV versus 18 (60%) of 30 with the use of NCPAP (P <.01). There was no difference in apnea/bradycardia episodes in the 2 groups during the 72-hour study period. Among 55 infants who had PFT, 80% (8 of 10) with dynamic lung compliance of >/=0.5 mL/kg/cm H(2)O and expiratory airway resistance of </=70 cm H(2)O/L/s were extubated successfully. In infants with poor lung function (dynamic lung compliance: <0.5 mL/kg/cm H(2)O; expiratory airway resistance: >70 cm H(2)O/L/s), successful extubation was seen in 93% (27 of 29) in the SNIPPV group and 60% (15 of 25) in the NCPAP group. When weight was controlled for at the time of extubation, the odds of success in the SNIPPV group were 21.1 times higher (95% confidence interval: 3.4, 130.1) than that of the NCPAP group.
Conclusions: SNIPPV is more effective than NCPAP in weaning infants with RDS from the ventilator. PFT may be useful in predicting successful extubation.
Similar articles
-
Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants.Pediatrics. 2001 Apr;107(4):638-41. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.638. Pediatrics. 2001. PMID: 11335736 Clinical Trial.
-
Synchronized Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Prevention of Extubation Failure in Infants after Congenital Heart Surgery.Heart Surg Forum. 2021 Mar 5;24(2):E249-E255. doi: 10.1532/hsf.3515. Heart Surg Forum. 2021. PMID: 33798054
-
Comparison of non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(10):1546-51. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1059809. Epub 2015 Jul 28. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. PMID: 26135774 Clinical Trial.
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37497794 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bi-Level Noninvasive Ventilation in Neonatal Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neonatology. 2021;118(3):264-273. doi: 10.1159/000514637. Epub 2021 Mar 23. Neonatology. 2021. PMID: 33756488
Cited by
-
A Review on Non-invasive Respiratory Support for Management of Respiratory Distress in Extremely Preterm Infants.Front Pediatr. 2020 May 28;8:270. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00270. eCollection 2020. Front Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32548084 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: an update.Indian J Pediatr. 2007 Jan;74(1):73-7. doi: 10.1007/s12098-007-0032-z. Indian J Pediatr. 2007. PMID: 17264460 Review.
-
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 1;2(2):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7:CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4. PMID: 28146296 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Nasal CPAP for neonates: what do we know in 2003?Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 May;88(3):F168-72. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.3.f168. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003. PMID: 12719386 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-frequency nasal ventilation for 21 d maintains gas exchange with lower respiratory pressures and promotes alveolarization in preterm lambs.Pediatr Res. 2014 Apr;75(4):507-16. doi: 10.1038/pr.2013.254. Epub 2013 Dec 30. Pediatr Res. 2014. PMID: 24378898 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical