Barriers to domestic violence screening in the pediatric setting
- PMID: 11433060
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.1.98
Barriers to domestic violence screening in the pediatric setting
Abstract
Objective: By surveying practitioners in our community, we hoped to determine what pediatricians and family physicians (FPs) perceive as barriers to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Recommendation on Domestic Violence Screening.
Background: When screened in the pediatric setting, as many as 40% of mothers will disclose domestic violence (DV) by their partner. Recognizing the profound effects of DV on children, the AAP recently recommended that all practitioners incorporate DV screening as a part of routine anticipatory guidance. Yet, there is little information about whether pediatricians have the training, the time to screen, or understand the magnitude of this problem.
Design/methods: A 22-question survey about attitudes, training, and current DV screening practice was sent to all general pediatricians and FPs with admitting privileges to Children's Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, Ohio. A copy of the AAP recommendation on screening was included. The vast majority of practitioners with an appreciable pediatric practice in the surrounding tri-state area of 1.8 million people have privileges at the institution.
Results: After 2 mailings, 310 (57%) of 547 of questionnaires were returned. The majority of practitioners (64%) were unaware of the AAP recommendation, but 51% of practitioners screened at least high-risk families for DV and 49% had identified a case of DV in their practice. Still, only 8.5% routinely screened for DV and 74% had received no specific DV training. Fifty-eight percent of practitioners estimated the incidence of DV to be <5% in their practice. The most commonly perceived barriers to screening were lack of education (61%), office protocol (60%), time (59%), and support staff (55%). FPs were significantly more likely to have DV training (64% vs 21%), more likely to screen at least high-risk women (79% vs 56%), and more likely to have identified a case of DV (92% vs 40%) than pediatricians. FPs were less likely to cite lack of education (46% vs 65%) and lack of time (50% vs 61%) than pediatricians. Physicians licensed in Ohio were less likely to have specific domestic violence training (23% vs 60%) as compared with Kentucky physicians, where domestic violence education is required for licensing. Kentucky physicians were less likely to cite lack of education as barrier to DV screening (20% vs 62%). When comparing the characteristics of those who screen to those who do not, those with DV training were 10.9 times (odds adjusted ratio) more likely to screen.
Conclusions: Practitioners grossly underestimate the incidence of DV in their practices. Lack of education including knowledge of screening recommendations is a barrier to DV screening by pediatricians. Greater efforts are needed to educate pediatricians on DV for the AAP recommendations to be accepted.domestic violence, child abuse, screening, physician attitude.
Similar articles
-
A statewide survey of domestic violence screening behaviors among pediatricians and family physicians.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Apr;156(4):332-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.4.332. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002. PMID: 11929365
-
Screening for domestic violence in the community pediatric setting.Pediatrics. 1999 Oct;104(4 Pt 1):874-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.104.4.874. Pediatrics. 1999. PMID: 10506228
-
Parental screening for intimate partner violence by pediatricians and family physicians.Pediatrics. 2002 Sep;110(3):509-16. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.509. Pediatrics. 2002. PMID: 12205252
-
Dentists' Competence and Knowledge on Domestic Violence and How to Improve It-A Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 5;19(7):4361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19074361. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35410043 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventive care in the emergency department: screening for domestic violence in the emergency department.Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Oct;10(10):1118-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00585.x. Acad Emerg Med. 2003. PMID: 14525748 Review.
Cited by
-
Training reproductive health providers to talk about intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion: an exploratory study.Health Educ Res. 2018 Apr 1;33(2):175-185. doi: 10.1093/her/cyy007. Health Educ Res. 2018. PMID: 29506072 Free PMC article.
-
Pediatricians' Practices and Desired Resources for Addressing Intimate Partner Violence.Partner Abuse. 2024 Oct;15(4):550-570. doi: 10.1891/pa-2023-0044. Partner Abuse. 2024. PMID: 39568864 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Healthcare Sweden: Prevalence and Determinants.ISRN Nurs. 2011;2011:510692. doi: 10.5402/2011/510692. Epub 2011 Dec 27. ISRN Nurs. 2011. PMID: 22254143 Free PMC article.
-
Screening children for family violence: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Fam Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;2(2):161-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.113. Ann Fam Med. 2004. PMID: 15083858 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of the structural validity of the domestic violence healthcare providers' survey questionnaire using a Nigerian sample.J Inj Violence Res. 2010 Jun;2(2):75-83. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v2i2.41. J Inj Violence Res. 2010. PMID: 21483202 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous