Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale
- PMID: 11437307
- DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00342
Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: evidence for a linear subjective number scale
Abstract
When humans and animals compare two numbers, responding is faster and more accurate with increasing numerical disparity and decreasing numerical size. Researchers explaining these distance and size effects often, assume that the subjective number continuum is logarithmically compressed. An alternative hypothesis is that the subjective number continuum is linear, but positions farther along it are proportionately fuzzier, that is, less precisely located. These two hypotheses have been treated as functionally equivalent because of their similar empirical predictions. The current experiment sought to resolve this issue with a paradigm originally developed to address the subjective representation of time (time left). In our adaptation, pigeons were required to compare a constant number with the number remaining after a numerical subtraction. Our results indicate that subjective number is linearly, not logarithmically, related to objective number.
Comment in
-
Subtracting pigeons: logarithmic or linear?Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):244-6; discussion 247. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00343. Psychol Sci. 2001. PMID: 11437308 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Numerical reproduction in pigeons.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):409-27. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.409. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007. PMID: 17924789
-
Distance and magnitude effects in sequential number discrimination by pigeons.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010 Apr;36(2):206-16. doi: 10.1037/a0017226. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2010. PMID: 20384401
-
Subtracting pigeons: logarithmic or linear?Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):244-6; discussion 247. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00343. Psychol Sci. 2001. PMID: 11437308 No abstract available.
-
Time left: linear versus logarithmic subjective time.J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Apr;7(2):87-107. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981. PMID: 7241054
-
Mental time travel in animals: a challenging question.Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):173-83. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2006.01.009. Epub 2006 Feb 8. Behav Processes. 2006. PMID: 16466863 Review.
Cited by
-
What counts for 'counting'? Chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes, respond appropriately to relevant and irrelevant information in a quantity judgment task.Anim Behav. 2013 May 1;85(5):987-993. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.02.022. Anim Behav. 2013. PMID: 23750039 Free PMC article.
-
Is there an internal association of numbers to hands? The task set influences the nature of the SNARC effect.Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):1151-61. doi: 10.3758/bf03193485. Mem Cognit. 2007. PMID: 17910196
-
Searching for the Critical p of Macphail's Null Hypothesis: The Contribution of Numerical Abilities of Fish.Front Psychol. 2020 Jan 31;11:55. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00055. eCollection 2020. Front Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32116895 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Multiple spatial representations of number: evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;193(1):151-6. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1698-9. Epub 2009 Jan 22. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19159921
-
Ratio abstraction over discrete magnitudes by newly hatched domestic chicks (Gallus gallus).Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 28;6:30114. doi: 10.1038/srep30114. Sci Rep. 2016. PMID: 27465742 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical