Atrial Fibrillation
- PMID: 11445057
- DOI: 10.1007/s11936-001-0089-3
Atrial Fibrillation
Abstract
The conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to normal sinus rhythm should be attempted in patients who present with this condition, as long as the cure is not worse than the disease itself. In young patients with normal hearts, AF has a small impact on morbidity and mortality. The primary indication for conversion in this population is often symptoms. In contrast, in patients with diseased hearts or who are older than 65 years, maintaining sinus rhythm may have a favorable impact on stroke risk, ventricular function, and symptoms. In the absence of normal sinus rhythm, these patients should receive anticoagulants. Rate control is the preferred first-line strategy for asymptomatic patients and patients presenting with a history of long-standing, persistent AF, making conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm unlikely. Rate control may be used in patients who develop AF during an acute systemic illness, which will likely terminate with time or therapy. Conversion to sinus rhythm should be considered in patients with a first episode of AF, as unconverted AF tends to perpetuate itself. Conversion can be attempted if the duration of AF is less than 48 hours or if the patient has received anticoagulants when the duration is not known. Other indications for cardioversion are prolonged episodes in patients with otherwise infrequent episodes of paroxysmal AF, and in patients who refuse to take anticoagulants or in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated. After the patient is converted to sinus rhythm, the decision to initiate chronic drug therapy should be based on the presence of other cardiac and medical diseases that increase the risk of recurrence and serious symptoms in case of recurrence (such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or mitral stenosis). It is acceptable to manage patients with new-onset AF and normal cardiac function with cardioversion alone and not initiate chronic antiarrhythmic therapy afterwards. However, in patients with abnormal hearts (coronary artery disease, hypertensive or mitral valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathy) AF is likely to recur, and such patients should be placed on antiarrhythmic medication.
Similar articles
-
[Atrial fibrillation: always cardioversion? No].Ital Heart J Suppl. 2002 Jan;3(1):81-90. Ital Heart J Suppl. 2002. PMID: 11899578 Review. Italian.
-
[Effect of diabetes mellitus in recovery and maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation].Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2002 May-Jun;130(5-6):189-92. doi: 10.2298/sarh0206189p. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2002. PMID: 12395441 Serbian.
-
Rate versus rhythm control in atrial fibrillation.Cardiol Clin. 2004 Feb;22(1):63-9. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8651(03)00112-7. Cardiol Clin. 2004. PMID: 14994848 Review.
-
Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).Chest. 2008 Jun;133(6 Suppl):546S-592S. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-0678. Chest. 2008. PMID: 18574273
-
Current management of symptomatic atrial fibrillation.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001;1(2):127-39. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200101020-00006. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2001. PMID: 14728042 Review.
Cited by
-
Rationale and design of a prospective study of the clinical significance of atrial arrhythmias detected by implanted device diagnostics: the TRENDS study.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006 Jan;15(1):9-14. doi: 10.1007/s10840-006-7622-y. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16680544
-
The natural history of atrial fibrillation in patients with permanent pacemakers: is atrial fibrillation a progressive disease?J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;44(1):23-30. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0029-x. Epub 2015 Jul 3. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015. PMID: 26139311
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources