Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jun;71(Pt 2):243-59.
doi: 10.1348/000709901158505.

Stress and strain in teaching: a structural equation approach

Affiliations

Stress and strain in teaching: a structural equation approach

R van Dick et al. Br J Educ Psychol. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

Background: School teaching seems to be particularly stressful. The stress model of Lazarus and colleagues and its adaptation to educational settings by Kyriacou and Sutcliffe is the basis for an analysis of antecedents and consequences of teacher stress.

Aims: The first aim was to test the theoretical model of teacher stress on a large sample using structural equation statistics (study I). The results should then be cross-validated and the model enlarged by additional operationalisations (study II).

Samples: Heterogeneous samples of German school teachers (study I: N = 356, study II: N = 201).

Methods: In study I, standardised questionnaires measuring workload and mobbing as stressors, physical symptoms as stress reactions, and social support and self-efficacy as moderating variables. In addition to these concepts, coping strategies, burnout and absenteeism were assessed in study II.

Results: The structural equation modelling in study I revealed that the predications of the stress model hold true: Workload and mobbing lead to stress reactions, whereas principal support reduces the perception of workload and mobbing. Global support and self-efficacy moderate the relationships between the variables. These results were confirmed in study II and the model was enlarged by burnout and coping strategies. With all concepts, 12% of the variance of absenteeism can be explained.

Conclusions: Limitations of the studies, using cross-sectional data and self-reported measures are discussed. Practical implications for improving the situation are provided.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources