Once-daily oral gatifloxacin versus oral levofloxacin in treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections: double-blind, multicenter, randomized study
- PMID: 11451697
- PMCID: PMC90654
- DOI: 10.1128/AAC.45.8.2358-2362.2001
Once-daily oral gatifloxacin versus oral levofloxacin in treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections: double-blind, multicenter, randomized study
Abstract
This was a double-blind, multicenter study in which 410 adults (> or =18 years of age) with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were randomized to receive either 400 mg of gatifloxacin orally once daily or 500 mg of levofloxacin orally once daily for 7 to 10 days. The study protocol called for four assessments-before and during treatment, at the end of treatment, and posttreatment. Efficacy evaluations included clinical response and bacterial eradication rates. Of 407 treated patients, 202 (108 women, 94 men) received gatifloxacin and 205 (111 women, 94 men) received levofloxacin. For clinically evaluable patients, the cure rates were 91% for gatifloxacin and 84% for levofloxacin (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -2.0 to 15.2%). Clinical cure rates for microbiologically evaluable patients were 93% for gatifloxacin and 88% for levofloxacin (95% CI for the difference, -6.5 to 16.8%). The bacterial eradication rate was 92% for each group, with gatifloxacin eradicating 93% of the methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates and levofloxacin eradicating 91% of them. Both drugs were well tolerated. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate, and nausea was the most common adverse event in each treatment arm. Once-daily oral gatifloxacin (400 mg) is clinically efficacious and well tolerated compared with once-daily levofloxacin (500 mg) for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated SSTIs.
Similar articles
-
A multicentre, double-blind, randomised study comparing the efficacy and safety of oral levofloxacin versus ciprofloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections.Int J Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;52(2):69-74. Int J Clin Pract. 1998. PMID: 9624783 Clinical Trial.
-
Gatifloxacin 400 mg as a single shot or 200 mg once daily for 3 days is as effective as ciprofloxacin 250 mg twice daily for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Jun;23(6):596-605. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.12.017. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004. PMID: 15194131 Clinical Trial.
-
Cefdinir versus levofloxacin in patients with acute rhinosinusitis of presumed bacterial etiology: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study.Clin Ther. 2004 Dec;26(12):2026-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.12.004. Clin Ther. 2004. PMID: 15823766 Clinical Trial.
-
Levofloxacin. Its use in infections of the respiratory tract, skin, soft tissues and urinary tract.Drugs. 1998 Sep;56(3):487-515. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856030-00013. Drugs. 1998. PMID: 9777318 Review.
-
Levofloxacin: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections in the United States.Drugs. 2003;63(24):2769-802. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363240-00008. Drugs. 2003. PMID: 14664657 Review.
Cited by
-
The impact of antibiotics on clinical response over time in uncomplicated cellulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Infection. 2022 Aug;50(4):859-871. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01842-7. Epub 2022 May 20. Infection. 2022. PMID: 35593975
-
Development of a Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire (HRQL) for patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Infections (ESTI).BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Oct 11;6:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-148. BMC Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 17034641 Free PMC article.
-
Newer treatment options for skin and soft tissue infections.Drugs. 2004;64(15):1621-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200464150-00002. Drugs. 2004. PMID: 15257625 Review.
-
Gatifloxacin: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.Drugs. 2002;62(1):169-207. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262010-00007. Drugs. 2002. PMID: 11790160 Review.
-
Is coverage of S. aureus necessary in cellulitis/erysipelas? A literature review.Infection. 2020 Apr;48(2):183-191. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01382-7. Epub 2019 Dec 16. Infection. 2020. PMID: 31845187
References
-
- Alvarez-Alcoro S, Enzler M J. The macrolides: erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:613–634. - PubMed
-
- Ball P, Tillotson G. Tolerability of fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Past, present and future. Drug Saf. 1995;13:343–358. - PubMed
-
- Doern G V, Jones R N, Pfaller M A, Kugler K C, Beach M L The SENTRY Study Group of North America. Bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with skin and soft tissue infections: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997) Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1999;34:65–72. - PubMed
-
- Dudley M N. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of antibiotics with special reference to the fluoroquinolones. Am J Med. 1991;91(Suppl. 6A):45S–50S. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources