Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):279-89.

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection

Affiliations
  • PMID: 11452812
Review

Laparoscopic pancreatic resection

P Gentileschi et al. Chir Ital. 2001 May-Jun.

Abstract

The extent of reported laparoscopic resections vary from enucleation to pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although initial series have been reported with encouraging results, most patients with pancreatic disease requiring resection are still treated with an open approach. We present a review of our experience and of the world literature on laparoscopic pancreatic resection. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy has been attempted in 12 patients with a conversion rate of 33%. Complications occurred in the laparoscopic group. The laparoscopic patients have experienced no benefit in the postoperative recovery and convalescence. Early experience with the hand-assisted approach is promising. Sixty-eight laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies and enucleations have been reported to date. They were 42 distal pancreatectomies and 26 enucleations. Thirteen procedures have been converted to open surgery (19.1%). There was no mortality and the main postoperative complication was pancreatic leak (5 patients, 7.3%). Average hospital stay was 9 days. These results compare favorably with the outcomes after open pancreatic resection. While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy is not associated with patient benefit and may be accompanied by increased morbidity, laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and enucleation are safe, carry low morbidity and have encouraging results in terms of postoperative recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by