Readability and content of supplementary written drug information for patients used by Australian rheumatologists
- PMID: 11453330
- DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143438.x
Readability and content of supplementary written drug information for patients used by Australian rheumatologists
Abstract
Objective: To determine the readability and content of supplementary written drug information currently being given to patients by rheumatologists in Australia.
Design and participants: Blinded standardised review by two independent reviewers of supplementary written drug information routinely provided to patients by the 195 fully registered members of the Australian Rheumatology Association (ARA).
Main outcome measures: FOG and SMOG readability scores to estimate readability; critical appraisal of content according to predetermined criteria.
Results: 84 rheumatologists responded (43%), 45 of whom reported providing copies of written drug information to patients. Overall, 91 different documents were reviewed. Drugs most commonly considered were methotrexate (17), gold (16), sulfasalazine (10), penicillamine (10) and prednisolone (8). Level of agreement between reviewers for FOG and SMOG scores was fair to good (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.61 and 0.51, respectively). Mean (95% CI) FOG and SMOG scores were 12.6 (12.2-12.9) and 11 (10.7-11.2), respectively (implying that half of those in Year 12 [or aged 17 years] and Year 11 [or aged 16 years] according to the FOG and SMOG mean scores, respectively, will comprehend half of the text or more). For the same medication, there was a wide variation in the information provided, including which side effects were discussed. While 98% included some information about side effects, fewer considered dose (74%), drug interactions if applicable (70%), purpose of drug (67%), how and when to take the drug (62%), expected time to improvement (54%), what to do in the event of side effects (44%), the expected duration of therapy (18%) and what to do if a dose was missed (5%).
Conclusions: The reading level required to understand supplementary written drug information used by Australian rheumatologists is much higher than the average reading ability of the Australian population (estimated at Year 8 level). The content of this information varies widely and often omits important information.
Comment in
-
Usable written information for patients.Med J Aust. 2001 Jun 4;174(11):557-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143433.x. Med J Aust. 2001. PMID: 11453325 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Analysis of stroke patients' and carers' reading ability and the content and design of written materials: recommendations for improving written stroke information.Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.020. Epub 2005 Aug 10. Patient Educ Couns. 2006. PMID: 16098708
-
Assessing the readability and patient comprehension of rheumatology medicine information sheets: a cross-sectional Health Literacy Study.BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 5;9(2):e024582. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024582. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30813117 Free PMC article.
-
A descriptive study of the readability of patient information leaflets designed by nurses.J Adv Nurs. 1997 Nov;26(5):985-91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00455.x. J Adv Nurs. 1997. PMID: 9372404
-
An evidence-based assessment of the clinical significance of drug-drug interactions between disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and non-antirheumatic drugs according to rheumatologists and pharmacists.Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1737-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.009. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19808132 Review.
-
Update of French society for rheumatology recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis.Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Mar;86(2):135-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Oct 10. Joint Bone Spine. 2019. PMID: 30315988
Cited by
-
Beyond needs and expectations: identifying the barriers and facilitators to written medicine information provision and use in Australia.Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):220-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00753.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6. Health Expect. 2014. PMID: 22390211 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of the quality and health literacy demand of online information on pelvic floor exercises to reduce stress urinary incontinence.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024 Dec;64(6):542-547. doi: 10.1111/ajo.13830. Epub 2024 Apr 30. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024. PMID: 38686657 Free PMC article.
-
Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: why do patients not take what we prescribe?Rheumatol Int. 2016 Nov;36(11):1535-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3566-4. Epub 2016 Sep 24. Rheumatol Int. 2016. PMID: 27665289 Review.
-
Multimedia educational interventions for consumers about prescribed and over-the-counter medications.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD008416. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008416.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23633355 Free PMC article.
-
The contents of dental implant patient information leaflets available within the UK.Br Dent J. 2015 Feb;218(4):E7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.99. Br Dent J. 2015. PMID: 25720914
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources