Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing
- PMID: 11453621
- PMCID: PMC1284820
- DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-311
Stimuli inevitably generated by behavior that avoids electric shock are inherently reinforcing
Erratum in
- J Exp Anal Behav 2001 Nov;76(3):350
Abstract
A molecular analysis based on the termination of stimuli that are positively correlated with shock and the production of stimuli that are negatively correlated with shock provides a parsimonious count for both traditional discrete-trial avoidance behavior and the data derived from more recent free-operant procedures. The necessary stimuli are provided by the intrinsic feedback generated by the subject's behavior, in addition to those presented by the experimenter. Moreover, all data compatible with the molar principle of shock-frequency reduction as reinforcement are also compatible with a delay-of-shock gradient, but some data compatible with the delay gradient are not compatible with frequency reduction. The delay gradient corresponds to functions relating magnitude of behavioral effect to the time between conditional and unconditional stimuli, the time between conditioned and primary reinforcers, and the time between responses and positive reinforcers.
Comment in
-
Safe periods both explain and need explaining.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):335-8; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-335. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453622 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Molar versus as a paradigm clash.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):338-41; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-338. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453623 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the molar-molecular distinction: we need multiscaled analyses.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):342-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-342. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453624 Free PMC article.
-
The molarity of molecular theory and the molecularity of molar theory.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):348-50; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-348. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453625 Free PMC article.
-
Are responses in avoidance procedures "safety" signals?J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):351-4; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-351. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453626 Free PMC article.
-
A few minor suggestions.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):354-7; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-354. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453627 Free PMC article.
-
Explaining avoidance: two factors are still better than one.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):357-61; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-357. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453628 Free PMC article.
-
Two-factor theory has strong empirical evidence of validity.J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 May;75(3):362-5; discussion 367-78. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2001.75-362. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001. PMID: 11453629 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
