Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar disc herniation: comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and Love's method
- PMID: 11462094
- DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200107150-00022
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging of lumbar disc herniation: comparison of microendoscopic discectomy and Love's method
Abstract
Study design: We performed a study to compare the magnetic resonance imaging findings up to 24 weeks after microendoscopic discectomy or surgery using Love's method in patients with lumbar disc herniation.
Objectives: The objective was to determine whether or not microendoscopic discectomy was minimally invasive with respect to the nerve roots, cauda equina, and paravertebral muscles by comparing the postoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients treated by microendoscopic discectomy and the conventional Love's method.
Summary of background data: We introduced microendoscopic discectomy as a minimally invasive surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation in September 1998 and have obtained good results. Microendoscopic discectomy is superior to the conventional Love's method in that it reduces postoperative pain, shortens the duration of hospitalization, and allows earlier resumption of normal activities. However, the effect of microendoscopic discectomy on the nerves and paravertebral muscles has not been evaluated objectively.
Methods: Enhancement of the nerve roots and paravertebral muscles, as well as the configuration of the cauda equina at the level of herniation, was assessed on axial magnetic resonance images obtained with contrast enhancement using gadolinium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid before surgery and 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery in 25 patients who underwent microendoscopic discectomy and 15 patients who were treated using Love's method.
Results: Increased enhancement of the nerve roots was seen in 50.0% of the microendoscopic discectomy group and 46.2% of the Love group at 1 week after surgery. Enhancement of the paravertebral muscles at the surgical site tended to persist for longer in the microendoscopic discectomy group than in the Love group. However, muscle enhancement was widespread in some patients from the Love group. Abnormalities of the cauda equina attributed to surgical invasion were seen in 12.5% of the microscopic discectomy group and 15.4% of the Love group at 1 week after surgery.
Conclusions: Microendoscopic discectomy had an effect on the nerve roots and cauda equina that was comparable with that of Love's method. The magnetic resonance images of the route of entry failed to show that microendoscopic discectomy is appreciably less invasive with respect to the paravertebral muscles.
Similar articles
-
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29303469 Clinical Trial.
-
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic surgery (PTES) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 209 consecutive cases.J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Feb 8;12(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0524-0. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28178992 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb;23(1):30-4. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318193c16c. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010. PMID: 20051925
-
[Therapeutic effect and safety of microendoscopic discectomy versus conventional open discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a Meta analysis].Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016 Aug 25;29(8):744-751. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2016.08.014. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2016. PMID: 29282935 Review. Chinese.
-
Microendoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2016 May;25(5):1373-1381. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4523-3. Epub 2016 Mar 21. Eur Spine J. 2016. PMID: 27001138 Review.
Cited by
-
The efficacy of minimally invasive discectomy compared with open discectomy: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 May;16(5):452-62. doi: 10.3171/2012.1.SPINE11404. Epub 2012 Mar 9. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22404142 Free PMC article.
-
Current techniques of endoscopic decompression in spine surgery.Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(Suppl 5):S169. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.98. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 31624735 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic lumbar discectomy: Experience of first 100 cases.Indian J Orthop. 2010 Apr;44(2):184-90. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.62051. Indian J Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20419006 Free PMC article.
-
Posterior endoscopic discectomy: Results in 300 patients.Indian J Orthop. 2012 Jan;46(1):81-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.91640. Indian J Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22345812 Free PMC article.
-
Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.Eur Spine J. 2011 Jan;20(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1482-y. Epub 2010 Jun 16. Eur Spine J. 2011. PMID: 20556439 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials