A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants
- PMID: 11463368
A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants
Abstract
Introduction: Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants for removal of respiratory secretions can be associated with morbidity. Routine endotracheal suctioning is inadvisable, but the safe minimum endotracheal suctioning frequency for prevention of airway obstruction has not been determined.
Hypothesis: Decreasing suctioning frequency from every 4 hours to every 8 hours (plus as needed) would have no clinically important effect on the primary outcomes (nosocomial bloodstream infection [BSI], ventilator-associated pneumonia [VAP], and bacterial airway colonization) or secondary outcomes (reintubation rates, need for postural drainage, severity of bronchopulmonary dysplasia [BPD], neonatal mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and duration of hospitalization).
Methods: We conducted a sequential retrospective study of 90 very-low-birthweight infants who were mechanically ventilated for longer than 7 days and who underwent endotracheal suctioning every 4 hours (plus as needed) and 90 similar infants who underwent endotracheal suctioning every 8 hours (plus as needed). Two-pass endotracheal suctioning used during the study period required predetermined measurement of the suction catheter and prior instillation of saline.
Results: The 2 treatment groups were similar in demographic and clinical characteristics, including survival (90% and 85%), age at time of death (28 and 33 d), mean birthweight (926 and 934 g), gestational age (27 and 27 wk), duration of ventilation (29 and 27 d), and duration of stay (55 and 53 d). Regardless of suctioning frequency, airway colonization with Gram-positive cocci occurred in the majority of patients by 2 weeks of life. Forty-three percent of the infants suctioned every 4 hours and 44% of those suctioned every 8 hours became airway colonized with Gram-negative bacilli. No Gram-negative bacilli species was more likely to be associated with either treatment group. VAP was diagnosed in 5 of the infants suctioned every 4 hours and in 9 of the infants suctioned every 8 hours. Nosocomial BSI occurred in 18 of the infants suctioned every 4 hours and in 21 of the infants suctioned every 8 hours. The difference in incidence of VAP and BSI was due to a epidemic that started before the change in suctioning frequency. During hospitalization, approximately one fourth of the patients in each group required postural drainage and were reintubated 11 and 10 times per 100 ventilator days, respectively. A comparable number of infants in each group developed severe BPD and were discharged home on oxygen. Suctionings per patient per ventilator day were 6 for the group suctioned every 4 hours and 4 for the group suctioned every 8 hours (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: A low-frequency suctioning regimen (every 8 hours plus as needed) can be implemented without increasing the incidence of nosocomial BSI, VAP, bacterial airway colonization, frequency of reintubation, need for postural drainage, severity of BPD, neonatal mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, or duration of hospitalization. Although the minimum suctioning frequency for removal of unwanted respiratory secretions is yet to be established, a substantial reduction in endotracheal suctioning frequency appears to be safe.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of a closed (Trach Care MAC) with an open endotracheal suction system in small premature infants.J Perinatol. 2000 Apr-May;20(3):151-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200330. J Perinatol. 2000. PMID: 10802838
-
Purulence and gram-negative bacilli in tracheal aspirates of mechanically ventilated very low birth weight infants.J Perinatol. 2001 Sep;21(6):376-81. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7210549. J Perinatol. 2001. PMID: 11593372
-
Is it safer to intubate premature infants in the delivery room?Pediatrics. 2005 Jun;115(6):1660-5. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2493. Pediatrics. 2005. PMID: 15930230
-
Secretion management in the mechanically ventilated patient.Respir Care. 2007 Oct;52(10):1328-42; discussion 1342-7. Respir Care. 2007. PMID: 17894902 Review.
-
A comprehensive review of pediatric endotracheal suctioning: Effects, indications, and clinical practice.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Sep;9(5):465-77. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31818499cc. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18679146 Review.
Cited by
-
Discrepancy between guidelines and practice of tracheal suctioning in mechanically ventilated patients: a French multicenter observational study.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jul;39(7):1335-6. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2936-6. Epub 2013 May 1. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23636829 No abstract available.
-
[2020 clinical practice guidelines of endotracheal suctioning in neonates with mechanical ventilation].Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jun;22(6):533-542. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2004168. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2020. PMID: 32571449 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Clinical review: airway hygiene in the intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2008;12(2):209. doi: 10.1186/cc6830. Epub 2008 Mar 31. Crit Care. 2008. PMID: 18423061 Free PMC article. Review.
-
As-needed endotracheal suctioning protocol vs a routine endotracheal suctioning in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A randomized controlled trial.Colomb Med (Cali). 2018 Jun 30;49(2):148-153. doi: 10.25100/cm.v49i2.2273. Colomb Med (Cali). 2018. PMID: 30104806 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Short-Term Effects of Conventional Chest Physiotherapy and Expiratory Flow Increase Technique on Respiratory Parameters, Heart Rate, and Pain in Mechanically Ventilated Premature Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 30;12(23):2408. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232408. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39685030 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical