Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Jul 21;323(7305):157-62.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157.

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests

J J Deeks  1
Affiliations
Review

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests

J J Deeks. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic plot of endovaginal ultrasonography for detecting endometrial cancer
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimates from 20 studies of sensitivity and specificity of measurement of endometrial thicknesses of more than 5 mm using endovaginal ultrasonography for detecting endometrial cancer.15 Points indicate estimates of sensitivity and specificity. Horizontal lines are 95% confidence intervals for estimates. Size of points reflects total sample size
Figure 3
Figure 3
Receiver operating characteristic plots showing three approaches to meta-analysis of 20 studies of diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal ultrasonography for detecting endometrial cancer. Results of studies are indicated by squares. Area of squares is proportional to study sample size. Fitted lines indicate (left) average sensitivity and specificity, (centre) average positive and negative likelihood ratios, and (right) average diagnostic odds ratios. Figures in brackets are 95% confidence intervals for summary estimates
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Sackett DL, Haynes RB, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine. 2nd ed. Boston: Little, Brown; 1991.
    1. Irwig L, Tosteson AN, Gatsonis CA, Lau J, Colditz G, Chalmers TC, et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:667–676. - PubMed
    1. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M. Meta-analytical methods for diagnostic test accuracy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:119–130. - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Methods Group on Systematic Review of Screening and Diagnostic Tests. Recommended methods [updated 6 Jun 1996]. www.cochrane.org/cochrane/sadtdoc1.htm (accessed 27 March 2001).
    1. Vamvakas EC. Meta-analyses of studies of diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of concepts and methods. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1998;122:675–686. - PubMed