Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark
- PMID: 11464561
- DOI: 10.1068/p3092
Cognitive suppression of tilt sensations during linear horizontal self-motion in the dark
Abstract
On the basis of models of otolith functioning, one would expect that, during sinusoidal linear self-motion in darkness, percepts of body tilt are experienced. However, this is normally not the case, which suggests that the otoliths are not responsive to small deviations from the vertical of the gravito-inertial force vector acting on them. Here we show that this is incorrect. Subjects usually know on what kind of linear motion device they are (going to be) moved, having seen it prior to experimentation. This may result in a cognitive suppression of such otolith responses. In the present study, subjects were kept completely unaware of how they were moved and were asked to report on how they thought they moved. About 50% of the reports included tilt percepts almost immediately. It is concluded that this reveals the presence of otolith responsiveness to even small and short-lived deviations of the gravito-inertial force vector from verticality, a responsiveness which is suppressed when (prior) cognitions exist that the motion path is purely in the horizontal plane.
Similar articles
-
Compensatory manual motor responses while object wielding during combined linear visual and physical roll tilt stimulation.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;192(4):683-94. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1581-8. Epub 2008 Oct 2. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 18830585
-
Time course and magnitude of illusory translation perception during off-vertical axis rotation.J Neurophysiol. 2006 Mar;95(3):1571-87. doi: 10.1152/jn.00613.2005. Epub 2005 Nov 30. J Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16319215 Clinical Trial.
-
Neural processing of gravito-inertial cues in humans. IV. Influence of visual rotational cues during roll optokinetic stimuli.J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):390-400. doi: 10.1152/jn.00513.2001. J Neurophysiol. 2003. PMID: 12522188
-
Eye movements and motion perception during off-vertical axis rotation after spaceflight.J Vestib Res. 2013;23(1):13-22. doi: 10.3233/VES-130471. J Vestib Res. 2013. PMID: 23549051
-
Vestibular perception and action employ qualitatively different mechanisms. I. Frequency response of VOR and perceptual responses during Translation and Tilt.J Neurophysiol. 2005 Jul;94(1):186-98. doi: 10.1152/jn.00904.2004. Epub 2005 Feb 23. J Neurophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15728767
Cited by
-
Spatial cognition, body representation and affective processes: the role of vestibular information beyond ocular reflexes and control of posture.Front Integr Neurosci. 2014 May 27;8:44. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00044. eCollection 2014. Front Integr Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24904327 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.J Neurophysiol. 2017 Oct 1;118(4):2499-2506. doi: 10.1152/jn.00439.2017. Epub 2017 Aug 16. J Neurophysiol. 2017. PMID: 28814635 Free PMC article.
-
Motion perception during variable-radius swing motion in darkness.J Neurophysiol. 2009 Oct;102(4):2232-44. doi: 10.1152/jn.00116.2009. Epub 2009 Jul 22. J Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19625542 Free PMC article.
-
Constructive perception of self-motion.J Vestib Res. 2008;18(5-6):249-66. J Vestib Res. 2008. PMID: 19542599 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Using virtual reality to augment perception, enhance sensorimotor adaptation, and change our minds.Front Syst Neurosci. 2014 Apr 8;8:56. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00056. eCollection 2014. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24782724 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources