Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 May;18(5):245-9.
doi: 10.1023/a:1016614217411.

Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?

T Perri et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to determine the risk of premature delivery among singleton pregnancies derived from assisted reproduction technology (ART).

Methods: Ninety-five singleton ART pregnancies and 190 matched spontaneous pregnancies were assessed for preterm delivery rates, pregnancy complications, and cesarean section rates in a retrospective study at an academic medical center.

Results: Among the ART singleton deliveries group (n = 95), 19 (20%) were preterm, which was statistically significantly higher than the 4% (8 of 190) found in the control group. Among the pregnancies achieved by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in the severe male-factor infertility subgroup (n = 22), only one preterm delivery occurred (4.5%).

Conclusions: Singleton ART pregnancies are at an increased risk of preterm delivery compared to singleton pregnancies after spontaneous conception. The higher rate may be attributed to various infertility cofactors, such as uterine malformations, previous operative procedures that involved cervical dilatation, and a history of pelvic infection. This is supported by the finding that ICSI-derived pregnancies in couples with strict male-factor infertility are not at an increased risk of preterm delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjo T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB. Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 1999;354:1579–1585. - PubMed
    1. Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: A case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:688–695. - PubMed
    1. Wennerholm UB, Hanson PO, Wennergren M, Kjellmer I. Pregnancy complications and short-term follow-up of infants born after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF/ET) Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1991;70:565–573. - PubMed
    1. McFaul PB, Patel N, Mills J. An audit of the obstetric outcome of 148 consecutive pregnancies from assisted conception: Implications for neonatal services. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993;100:820–825. - PubMed
    1. Verlaenen H, Cammy H, Derde MP, Amy JJ. Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: Expectations and outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:906–910. - PubMed

Publication types