Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 May;18(5):250-6.
doi: 10.1023/a:1016662100572.

The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction

J Balasch et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare ovarian response and oocyte and embryo yields in women undergoing ovulation induction for IVF/ICSI using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) alone or in combination with recombinant human LH (rhLH).

Methods: Patients were randomized to receive rhFSH alone (group F; n = 13) or rhFSH + rhLH (group L; n = 15). rhFSH was administered according to a step-down protocol; patients assigned to group L received rhLH at a fixed dose of 75 IU (1 ampoule) throughout the treatment period.

Results: The total dose of rhFSH, number of growing follicles, and serum concentrations of estradiol (E2) on the day of hCG administration were similar in both treatment groups. However, the percentage of metaphase II oocytes and fertilization rate were significantly higher in group F than in group L. The lower fertilization rates associated with rhLH were also seen in a subgroup of patients from group L who had undergone a previous ART cycle stimulated with FSH only and thus acted as their own controls. However, when in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were considered separately, differences in fertilization rates were statistically significant only for oocytes treated by conventional IVF.

Conclusions: This study shows that the addition of recombinant LH to recombinant FSH in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing ART does not improve the ovarian response and even may have a negative impact on oocyte maturation and fertilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Filicori M. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in ovulation induction: currents status and perspectives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:2413–2416. - PubMed
    1. Lunenfeld B, Lunenfeld E. Gonadotropic preparations-Lessons learned. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:812–814. - PubMed
    1. Hull MGR, Armatage RJ, McDermott A. Use of follicle-stimulating hormone alone (urofollitropin*) to stimulate the ovaries for assisted conception after pituitary desensitization. Fertil Steril. 1994;62::997–1003. - PubMed
    1. Loumaye E, Engrand P, Howles CM, et al. Assessment of the role of serum luteinizing hormone and estradiol response to follicle-stimulating hormone on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:889–899. - PubMed
    1. Daya S. hMGversus FSH: Is there any difference? In: Filicori M, Flamigni C, editors. Ovulation Induction: Update' 98. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group; 1998. pp. 183–192.