The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction
- PMID: 11464575
- PMCID: PMC3455335
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1016662100572
The effect of exogenous luteinizing hormone (LH) on oocyte viability: evidence from a comparative study using recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) alone or in combination with recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing assisted reproduction
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to compare ovarian response and oocyte and embryo yields in women undergoing ovulation induction for IVF/ICSI using recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) alone or in combination with recombinant human LH (rhLH).
Methods: Patients were randomized to receive rhFSH alone (group F; n = 13) or rhFSH + rhLH (group L; n = 15). rhFSH was administered according to a step-down protocol; patients assigned to group L received rhLH at a fixed dose of 75 IU (1 ampoule) throughout the treatment period.
Results: The total dose of rhFSH, number of growing follicles, and serum concentrations of estradiol (E2) on the day of hCG administration were similar in both treatment groups. However, the percentage of metaphase II oocytes and fertilization rate were significantly higher in group F than in group L. The lower fertilization rates associated with rhLH were also seen in a subgroup of patients from group L who had undergone a previous ART cycle stimulated with FSH only and thus acted as their own controls. However, when in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were considered separately, differences in fertilization rates were statistically significant only for oocytes treated by conventional IVF.
Conclusions: This study shows that the addition of recombinant LH to recombinant FSH in pituitary-suppressed women undergoing ART does not improve the ovarian response and even may have a negative impact on oocyte maturation and fertilization.
Similar articles
-
Ovarian responses to recombinant FSH or HMG in normogonadotrophic women following pituitary desensitization by a depot GnRH agonist for assisted reproduction.Reprod Biomed Online. 2003 Jul-Aug;7(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61726-9. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003. PMID: 12930572
-
Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment.J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Sep;88(9):4186-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021953. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003. PMID: 12970285 Clinical Trial.
-
Recombinant gonadotrophins associated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) in ovarian stimulation for ICSI: comparison of r-FSH alone and in combination with r-LH.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jun 1;126(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.023. Epub 2005 Dec 27. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006. PMID: 16377062 Clinical Trial.
-
Outlook: who needs LH in ovarian stimulation?Reprod Biomed Online. 2006 May;12(5):599-607. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61186-8. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006. PMID: 16790105 Review.
-
Role of LH and FSH in ovarian function.Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000 Mar 30;161(1-2):25-30. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(99)00219-1. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000. PMID: 10773387 Review.
Cited by
-
Luteinizing hormone and its dilemma in ovulation induction.J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011 Jan;4(1):2-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.82351. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011. PMID: 21772731 Free PMC article.
-
The role of recombinant LH in women with hypo-response to controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0460-4. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2019. PMID: 30728019 Free PMC article.
-
Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jun 21;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00759-4. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34154604 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled ovarian stimulation protocols for assisted reproduction: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 1;7(7):CD012586. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012586.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40590303 Review.
-
Recombinant human luteinizing hormone increases endometrial thickness in women undergoing assisted fertility treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 29;15:1434625. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1434625. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39135787 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Filicori M. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs in ovulation induction: currents status and perspectives. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:2413–2416. - PubMed
-
- Lunenfeld B, Lunenfeld E. Gonadotropic preparations-Lessons learned. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:812–814. - PubMed
-
- Hull MGR, Armatage RJ, McDermott A. Use of follicle-stimulating hormone alone (urofollitropin*) to stimulate the ovaries for assisted conception after pituitary desensitization. Fertil Steril. 1994;62::997–1003. - PubMed
-
- Loumaye E, Engrand P, Howles CM, et al. Assessment of the role of serum luteinizing hormone and estradiol response to follicle-stimulating hormone on in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:889–899. - PubMed
-
- Daya S. hMGversus FSH: Is there any difference? In: Filicori M, Flamigni C, editors. Ovulation Induction: Update' 98. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group; 1998. pp. 183–192.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources