Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Jul;96(7):2126-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03947.x.

Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Disappointing sensitivity of endoscopic markers for villous atrophy in a high-risk population: implications for celiac disease diagnosis during routine endoscopy

W Dickey et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic markers of duodenal villous atrophy (VA) can facilitate diagnosis of celiac disease during routine upper GI endoscopy. We studied their sensitivity for VA in a large series of patients undergoing GI endoscopy specifically for duodenal biopsy. Poor sensitivity in this setting would have significant and adverse implications for their performance during routine endoscopy.

Methods: All patients with VA on duodenal biopsy performed for positive serum endomysial antibody (EmA) and/or clinical features suggestive of celiac disease were included. The second part of duodenum was inspected carefully for endoscopic markers using videogastroscopes.

Results: Of 129 patients studied, 99 (77%) had at least one endoscopic markers. The most commonly seen marker were a mosaic pattern mucosa (68 patients, 53%) and scalloping of duodenal folds (74 patients, 57%). The prevalence of markers was significantly lower for partial VA (15 of 26 patients, 58%) than for subtotal or total VA (84 of 103 patients, 82%) (p < 0.02).

Conclusions: Endoscopic markers have disappointing sensitivity even in a population at high risk of celiac disease, particularly for partial VA. Their performance may be even poorer in an unselected dyspeptic population. Although they may help improve diagnosis rates among patients with nonspecific dyspeptic symptoms, many patients, particularly those with milder enteropathy, will be missed. As celiac disease is an important cause of dyspepsia, consideration should be given to serological screening to further improve diagnosis rates, as few centers will have the resources to routinely biopsy all patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Endoscopic markers of celiac disease.
    Mauriño E, Bai JC. Mauriño E, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Mar;97(3):760-1. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05565.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 11922578 No abstract available.
  • Celiac disease: improving the diagnosis.
    Brocchi E, Tomassetti P, Biasco G, Corazza G, Gasbarrini G, Corinaldesi R. Brocchi E, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 May;97(5):1269-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05723.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12014747 No abstract available.

Publication types