Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Jun;24(3):353-63.
doi: 10.1006/jado.2000.0402.

Characteristics of closeness in adolescent romantic relationships

Affiliations

Characteristics of closeness in adolescent romantic relationships

R E Adams et al. J Adolesc. 2001 Jun.

Abstract

This investigation was designed to describe characteristics of closeness in the romantic relationships of early, mid and late adolescents, and to determine whether adolescent reports of relationship authority and reciprocity are linked to perceptions of interdependence, interaction frequency, activity diversity, influence, and relationship duration. Age was positively associated with interdependence, daily social interaction, weekly activity diversity, and reciprocity but not with influence, authority, or relationship duration; gender was unrelated to all characteristics of closeness. Authority and reciprocity were each positively associated with relationship influence. Authority moderated associations between reciprocity and several characteristics of closeness such that reciprocity was positively linked to interdependence, daily social interaction, and weekly activity diversity, but only in relationships characterized by low levels of authority. Neither reciprocity nor authority was associated with relationship duration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reciprocity and interdependence at three levels of authority.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reciprocity and daily social interaction at three levels of authority.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reciprocity and weekly activity diversity at three levels of authority.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psycology. 1992;63:596–612.
    1. Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto AM. Issues in studying close relationships: Conceptualizing and measuring closeness. In: Hendrick C, editor. Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 10. Close relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1989a. pp. 63–91.
    1. Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto AM. The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1989b;57:792–807.
    1. Berndt TJ. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Vol. 30. Relationships as developmental contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1999. Friends’ influence on children’s adjustment to school; pp. 85–107.
    1. Buhrmester D, Furman W. The development of companionship and intimacy. Child Development. 1987;58:1101–1103. - PubMed

Publication types