Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Sep;69(3):601-14.
doi: 10.1086/323037. Epub 2001 Jul 30.

Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples

Affiliations

Quantitative similarity-based association tests using population samples

S Zhang et al. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Sep.

Abstract

Although genetic association studies using unrelated individuals may be subject to bias caused by population stratification, alternative methods that are robust to population stratification, such as family-based association designs, may be less powerful. Furthermore, it is often more feasible and less expensive to collect unrelated individuals. Recently, several statistical methods have been proposed for case-control association tests in a structured population; these methods may be robust to population stratification. In the present study, we propose a quantitative similarity-based association test (QSAT) to identify association between a candidate marker and a quantitative trait of interest, through use of unrelated individuals. For the QSAT, we first determine whether two individuals are from the same subpopulation or from different subpopulations, using genotype data at a set of independent markers. We then perform an association test between the candidate marker and the quantitative trait, through incorporation of such information. Simulation results based on either coalescent models or empirical population genetics data show that the QSAT has a correct type I error rate in the presence of population stratification and that the power of the QSAT is higher than that of family-based association designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Electronic-Database Information

    1. ALFRED, http://alfred.med.yale.edu/alfred/index.asp (for empirical population genetics data)
    1. Hongyu Zhao Lab of Statistical Genetics, http://bioinformatics.med.yale.edu/ (for QSAT computer program)

References

    1. Abecasis GR, Cardon LR, Cookson OC (2000) A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 66:279–292 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bacanu SA, Devlin B, Roeder K (2000) The power of genomic control. Am J Hum Genet 66:1933–1944 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Celeux G, Govaert G (1995) Gaussian parsimonious clustering model. Pattern Recognition 28:781–793
    1. Devlin B, Roeder K (1999) Genomic control for association studies. Biometrics 55:997–1004 - PubMed
    1. Fulker DW, Cherny SS, Sham PC, Hewitt JK (1999) Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet 64:259–267 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources