Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals

Abstract

Background/purpose: Reports of clinical trials often lack adequate descriptions of design and analysis; recent attention has focused on improving this omission so readers can properly assess the strength of the findings and draw their own conclusions. Similar analysis of study design and methodologic standards associated with quality reporting has not been carried out for pediatric surgery journals.

Methods: All studies (n = 642) published in 1998 in Journal of Pediatric Surgery (JPS) and Pediatric Surgery International (PSI), were reviewed for demographic data and study design. The frequency of reporting of 11 basic elements of design and analysis was evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCT), nonrandomized clinical trials (NRCT), and retrospective cohorts (RC) from JPS by consensus of 2 assessors.

Results: Of the 642 studies, 17% of articles (111 of 642) were classified as clinical studies. Sixty-three were comparative studies and consisted of RC (n = 48), NRCT (n = 12), and RCT (n = 3). Two-thirds of articles published were either case reports or case series (431 of 642), and 16% were basic science articles. Demographic analysis showed a wide range of topics addressed, 4 authors per article, and multiple country of origin of authors. More than 66% of all RCT in JPS reported on eligibility criteria, admission before allocation, random allocation, method of randomization, patients' blindness to treatment, treatment complications, statistical analyses, statistical methods, loss to follow-up, and statistical methods; 2 elements of design and analysis, however, were poorly reported: blind assessment of outcome (33%) and power (17%).

Conclusions: There were few randomized, controlled trials in pediatric surgery journals, and further attention should be given to evaluate the causal factors. Nine elements of quality reporting were well reported; however, 2 others were poorly reported; this may improve if editors of pediatric surgical journals provide authors with guidelines on how to report clinical trial design and analysis.