Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2001 Jun 20;121(16):1928-31.

[Norwegian breast cancer mortality rates and validity of Swedish mammographic studies]

[Article in Norwegian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 11488185
Free article
Comparative Study

[Norwegian breast cancer mortality rates and validity of Swedish mammographic studies]

[Article in Norwegian]
P H Zahl et al. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: The claim that screening for breast cancer with mammography reduces breast cancer mortality is mainly based on the results from the Swedish two-county trial (WE study), where the effect was reported to be 30% for the age group 50-69 years. The two-county trial has recently been criticised for inadequate randomisation and for not following the study protocol.

Methods: We do some simple calculations to study whether the WE study is robust for an alternative statistical analysis. We use stage-specific breast cancer mortality in the Norwegian population as the baseline mortality rate in Sweden. Then we study the expected reduction in overall breast cancer mortality in the WE study while we vary the mortality rate in stage 1 and the stage distribution.

Results: We show that a 30% reduction in overall mortality rate is in conflict with observed decline in mortality in stage 1 and the expected stage migration. One either has to decrease mortality in stage 1, or increase the reduction of tumours with distant metastases, or both, to much higher levels than those reported in Sweden to get a 30% reduction in overall mortality of breast cancer.

Conclusions: Our study adds further evidence to the proposal that the WE study is biased and not valid.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • [Mammography trials].
    Rutqvist LE. Rutqvist LE. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Sep 20;121(22):2636-7. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001. PMID: 11668767 Norwegian. No abstract available.
  • [Mammography screening saves life].
    Thoresen SØ. Thoresen SØ. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001 Oct 20;121(25):2995. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001. PMID: 11715787 Norwegian. No abstract available.

LinkOut - more resources