Use of cumulative mortality data in patients with acute myocardial infarction for early detection of variation in clinical practice: observational study
- PMID: 11498491
- PMCID: PMC37321
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7308.324
Use of cumulative mortality data in patients with acute myocardial infarction for early detection of variation in clinical practice: observational study
Abstract
Objectives: Use of cumulative mortality adjusted for case mix in patients with acute myocardial infarction for early detection of variation in clinical practice.
Design: Observational study.
Setting: 20 hospitals across the former Yorkshire region.
Participants: All 2153 consecutive patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction identified during three months.
Main outcome measures: Variable life-adjusted displays showing cumulative differences between observed and expected mortality of patients; expected mortality calculated from risk model based on admission characteristics of age, heart rate, and systolic blood pressure.
Results: The performance of two individual hospitals over three months was examined as an example. One, the smallest district hospital in the region, had a series of 30 consecutive patients but had five more deaths than predicted. The variable life-adjusted display showed minimal variation from that predicted for the first 15 patients followed by a run of unexpectedly high mortality. The second example was the main tertiary referral centre for the region, which admitted 188 consecutive patients. The display showed a period of apparently poor performance followed by substantial improvement, where the plot rose steadily from a cumulative net lives saved of -4 to 7. These variations in patient outcome are unlikely to have been revealed during conventional audit practice.
Conclusions: Variable life-adjusted display has been integrated into surgical care as a graphical display of risk-adjusted survival for individual surgeons or centres. In combination with a simple risk model, it may have a role in monitoring performance and outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction.
Figures


Comment in
-
Surgeon with worst performance figures might be best option.BMJ. 2001 Nov 3;323(7320):1071. BMJ. 2001. PMID: 11691778 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- National service framework for coronary heart disease: modern standards and service models. London: Department of Health; 2000.
-
- Iezzoni LI, Ash AS, Coffman GA, Moskowitz MA. Predicting in hospital mortality. A comparison of severity measurement approaches. Med Care. 1992;30:347–359. - PubMed
-
- Lee KL, Woodlief LH, Topol EJ, Weaver WD, Betriu A, Col J, et al. for the GUSTO-I Investigators. Predictors of 30-day mortality in the era of reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction. Results from an international trial of 41,021 patients Circulation 1995911659–1668. - PubMed
-
- Dorsch MF, Lawrance RA, Sapsford RJ, Oldham J, Greenwood DC, Jackson BM, et al, on behalf of the EMMACE (Evaluation of Methods and Management of Acute Coronary Events) Study Group. A simple benchmark for evaluating quality of care of patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart (in press). - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lawrance RA, Dorsch MF, Sapsford RJ, Hall AS. National service framework—Core data set. eHeart [online journal] 2000;84(2). http://heart.bmjjournals.com/cgi/eletters/84/2/116#EL1.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical