Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2001 Aug;24(8):533-41.
doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240803.

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism

Affiliations
Review

Spinal cord stimulation for chronic intractable angina pectoris: a unified theory on its mechanism

O A Latif et al. Clin Cardiol. 2001 Aug.

Abstract

The use of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic intractable anginal pain was first described in 1987. Numerous studies have demonstrated its efficacy in improving exercise tolerance, decreasing frequency of anginal episodes, and prolonging time to electrocardiographic signs of ischemia. This review will examine the potential mechanisms of this antianginal effect and propose a unified hypothesis explaining it. The effect of SCS involves a mutual interaction of decreased pain, decreased sympathetic tone, and a likely redistribution of myocardial blood flow to ischemic regions. Spinal cord stimulation reduces the transmission of nociceptive impulse via the spinothalamic tract due to an enhanced release of gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) from dorsal horn interneurons. Improvement of myocardial blood flow at the microvascular level has been demonstrated by positron emission tomography (PET). A decreased sympathetic tone has been shown by norepinephrine kinetics, tests of sympathetic reflexes, and the use of ganglionic blockers. We hypothesize that SCS exerts its beneficial effects by decreasing pain and decreasing sympathetic tone, the result of which is decreased myocardial oxygen consumption along with an improved myocardial microcirculatory blood flow.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schoebel FC Frazier H. Jessurun GAJ, De Jongste MJL, Kadipasaoglu KA, Jax TW, Heintzen MP, Cooley DA Strauer BE, Leschke M: Refractory angina pectoris in end‐stage coronary artery disease: Evolving therapeutic concepts. Am Heart J 1997; 134: 587–602 - PubMed
    1. Murray S, Carson KG, Ewings PD, Collins PD, James MA: Spinal cord stimulation significantly decreases the need for acute hospital admission for chest pain in patients with refractory angina pectoris. Heart 1999; 82 (1): 89–92 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Laffey J Murphy D. Regan J, O' Keeffe D: Cost‐benefit analysis of spinal cord stimulation for intractable angina pectoris: A win‐win scenario? Hasp Med 1998; 59 No. 10: 820–821 - PubMed
    1. Shealy CN, Mortimer TJ, Reswick JB: Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: Preliminary clinical report. AnesthAnalg 1967; 46: 489–491 - PubMed
    1. Wall PD, Sweet WH: Temporary abolition of pain in man. Science 1967; 155: 108–109 - PubMed