Long-term follow-up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical in-stent restenosis
- PMID: 11501607
- PMCID: PMC6654981
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.4960240806
Long-term follow-up after deferring angioplasty in asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical in-stent restenosis
Abstract
Background: Many patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are angina-free, but the optimal treatment for these patients remains uncertain.
Hypothesis: In cases with asymptomatic moderate noncritical ISR. deferral of the intervention may be safe and associated with favorable clinical outcome.
Methods: We evaluated the long-term clinical outcome of asymptomatic patients (Group 1, n = 98) with moderate noncritical ISR (< 70% diameter stenosis) after intervention was deferred, and compared it with that of patients (Group 2, n = 655) without restenosis. After repeat angioplasty was deferred, all patients were treated medically and later underwent angioplasty only in the case of clinical recurrence.
Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Clinical follow-up was available in all patients at 26.3+/-15.9 months. Twenty patients died during the follow-up: 1 in Group 1 and 19 in Group 2. Target lesion revascularization was performed in 3 patients in Group 1 and 11 patients in Group 2 during follow-up (p = NS), and new lesion revascularization in 2 patients in Group 1 and 27 patients in Group 2 (p = NS). Event-free survival rate (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization) was 86.7+/-6.1% in Group 1 and 84.8+/-2.2% in Group 2 at the end of follow-up (p = NS). Major adverse cardiac events were only associated with the presence of diabetic mellitus (hazards ratio 2.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-4.73, p<0.01). The percentage of patients receiving antianginal medication was similar between the two groups at the end of the study (p = NS).
Conclusions: Asymptomatic patients with moderate noncritical ISR have a good prognosis and similar clinical outcome as those without ISR, suggesting that it may be safe to defer repeat angioplasty in these patients until angina recurrence.
References
-
- Fischman DL, Leon MB, Baim DS, Schatz RA, Savage MP, Penn I, Detre K, Veltri L, Ricci D, Nobuyoshi M: A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 496–501 - PubMed
-
- Serruys PW de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, Macaya C, Rutsch W, Heyndrickx G, Emanuelsson H, Marco J, Legrand V, Materne P: A comparison of balloon‐expandable‐stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 489–495 - PubMed
-
- Dahl J, Radke PW, Haager PK, Koch KC, Kastrau F, Reffelmann T, Janssens U, Hanrath P, Klues HG: Clinical and angiographic predictors of recurrent restenosis after percutaneous transluminal rotational atherectomy for treatment of in‐stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 862–867 - PubMed
-
- Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Walsh C, Mackell P, Leon MB: Chronic arterial responses to stent implantation: A serial intravascular ultrasound analysis of Palmaz‐Schatz stents in native coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 113–119 - PubMed
-
- Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Dussaillant GR, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Kent KM, Griffin J, Leon MB: Patterns and mechanisms of in‐stent restenosis: A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation 1996; 94: 1247–1254 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
