Comparison of minithoracotomy with conventional sternotomy methods in valve surgery
- PMID: 11502493
Comparison of minithoracotomy with conventional sternotomy methods in valve surgery
Abstract
Background: To determine the differences in the operative findings between the two groups of patients who had undergone either minithoracotomy or conventional sternotomy.
Methods: We compared 12 valve operations that were performed in our clinic with minithoracotomy (group I) between January 1997 and November 1999 with 13 valve operations that were performed with conventional median sternotomy (group II) in the same period in regard to preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables, retrospectively. Preoperative variables were age, sex, bleeding time, clotting time, platelet count, and additional diseases like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, etc. Perioperative variables were extracorporeal circulation (ECC) time, cross-clamp (CC) time, and operation time. Postoperative variables were mechanical ventilation period, stay in the postoperative intensive care unit and hospital, mediastinal drainage amount, the amount of blood and blood products for transfusions, and costs. Group I consist of six mitral valve replacements (MVRs), three aortic valve replacements (AVRs), one aortic valve replacement combined with mitral valvuloplasty, and two tricuspid valve replacements (TVRs). Group II consist of nine MVRs and four AVRs.
Results: Statistical results are given with mean standard error (SEM) deviations. There were significant differences between the two groups in respect to operation time (in group I, mean operation time was 328 +/- SEM 22 minutes in group II, 271 +/- SEM 14 minutes (p < 0.04)); mediastinal drainage (in group I, mean drainage time was 283 +/- SEM 57 cc/m2, in group II, 490 +/- SEM 74 cc/m2 (p < 0.04)); and amounts of transfused blood and blood products (in group I, mean transfused blood products amount was 375 +/- SEM 115 cc/m2, in group II, 874 +/- SEM 184 cc/m2 (p < 0.03)).
Conclusion: The operation times are apparently longer in the minithoracotomy group. On the other hand, less mediastinal drainage occurred and less blood and blood products transfusion needs were determined to exist in the minithoracotomy group.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) compared to standard AVR.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999 Nov;16 Suppl 2:S80-3. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999. PMID: 10613563
-
Mitral valve replacement through a minimal right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy versus standard median sternotomy.Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Mar;87(3):704-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.11.059. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009. PMID: 19231374
-
Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients.Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 May;81(5):1599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.12.011. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16631641
-
Redo submammary incision for median sternotomy and cardiac repair.Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):163-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.116. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 15620937 Review.
-
Minimally invasive surgery with a partial sternotomy "J" approach.Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Winter;19(4):299-303. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2007.10.004. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007. PMID: 18395628 Review.
Cited by
-
Does minimal-access aortic valve replacement reduce the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation?Tex Heart Inst J. 2008;35(4):428-38. Tex Heart Inst J. 2008. PMID: 19156237 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12(12):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38054555 Free PMC article.
-
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Dec 6;12:CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub3. PMID: 28394022 Free PMC article. Updated.