Commentary on white paper the future of hormesis: where do we go from here? Edward J. Calabrese

Affiliations

Comment

D G Thomassen. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2001 Jul.

. 2001 Jul;31(4-5):665-7.

doi: 10.1080/20014091111938.

¹ Office of Biological and Environmental Research, U.S. Department of Energy, USA.

No abstract available

Comment on

The future of hormesis: where do we go from here?
Calabrese EJ. Calabrese EJ. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2001 Jul;31(4-5):637-48. doi: 10.1080/20014091111901. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2001. PMID: 11504189

Defining hormesis: comments on Calabrese and Baldwin (2002).
Chapman PM. Chapman PM. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Feb;21(2):99-101; discussion 113-4. doi: 10.1191/0960327102ht218oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002. PMID: 12102504
Defining hormesis: the necessary tool to clarify experimentally the low dose-response relationship.
Carelli G, Iavicoli I. Carelli G, et al. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Feb;21(2):103-4; discussion 113-4. doi: 10.1191/0960327102ht219oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002. PMID: 12102492
Commentary on "Cancer biology and hormesis: human tumor cell lines commonly display hormetic (biphasic) dose responses" by Edward J. Calabrese.
Talsness CE, Chahoud I. Talsness CE, et al. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2005 Jul;35(6):599-601. doi: 10.1080/10408440500246868. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2005. PMID: 16422397 Review. No abstract available.
Invited response to definition of hormesis (EJ Calabrese and LA Baldwin).
Pickrell JA, Oehme FW. Pickrell JA, et al. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002 Feb;21(2):107-9; discussion 113-4. doi: 10.1191/0960327102ht221oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2002. PMID: 12102494
Commentary on hormesis and public risk communication: is there a basis for public discussions?
Flynn J, MacGregor D. Flynn J, et al. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2003 Jan;22(1):31-4; discussion 43-9. doi: 10.1191/0960327103ht316oa. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2003. PMID: 12643301 Review.