Current choices of sterilizing grade membrane filters available to the pharmaceutical industry

Comment

B Bardo et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001 Jul-Aug.

. 2001 Jul-Aug;55(4):207-8.

Erratum in

No abstract available

Pall Corporation advocates the "broad-scale substitution".
Sundaram S, Howard G Jr, Martin JM. Sundaram S, et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2002 Jan-Feb;56(1):2-3. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2002. PMID: 11865779 No abstract available.

Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part III: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.1 micron rated filters.
Sundaram S, Eisenhuth J, Howard G Jr, Brandwein H. Sundaram S, et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):114-26. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001. PMID: 11310317
Relative appropriateness of the 0.1 or 0.2 micron-rated membrane filters to serve as sterilizing devices.
Jornitz MW, Meltzer TH. Jornitz MW, et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):58. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001. PMID: 11310320 No abstract available.
Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part I: Bacterial challenge tests on 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
Sundaram S, Eisenhuth J, Howard G Jr, Brandwein H. Sundaram S, et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):65-86. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001. PMID: 11310322
Retention of water-borne bacteria by membrane filters. Part II: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) characterization of bacterial species recovered downstream of 0.2/0.22 micron rated filters.
Sundaram S, Mallick S, Eisenhuth J, Howard G Jr, Brandwein H. Sundaram S, et al. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):87-113. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 2001. PMID: 11310323