Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):363-8.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7309.363.

Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites

P Elliott  1 , D Briggs, S Morris, C de Hoogh, C Hurt, T K Jensen, I Maitland, S Richardson, J Wakefield, L Jarup
Affiliations

Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites

P Elliott et al. BMJ. .

Erratum in

  • BMJ 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1182

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the risk of adverse birth outcomes associated with residence near landfill sites in Great Britain.

Design: Geographical study of risks of adverse birth outcomes in populations living within 2 km of 9565 landfill sites operational at some time between 1982 and 1997 (from a total of 19 196 sites) compared with those living further away.

Setting: Great Britain.

Subjects: Over 8.2 million live births, 43 471 stillbirths, and 124 597 congenital anomalies (including terminations).

Main outcome measures: All congenital anomalies combined, some specific anomalies, and prevalence of low and very low birth weight (<2500 g and <1500 g).

Results: For all anomalies combined, relative risk of residence near landfill sites (all waste types) was 0.92 (99% confidence interval 0.907 to 0.923) unadjusted, and 1.01 (1.005 to 1.023) adjusted for confounders. Adjusted risks were 1.05 (1.01 to 1.10) for neural tube defects, 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) for cardiovascular defects, 1.07 (1.04 to 1.10) for hypospadias and epispadias (with no excess of surgical correction), 1.08 (1.01 to 1.15) for abdominal wall defects, 1.19 (1.05 to 1.34) for surgical correction of gastroschisis and exomphalos, and 1.05 (1.047 to 1.055) and 1.04 (1.03 to 1.05) for low and very low birth weight respectively. There was no excess risk of stillbirth. Findings for special (hazardous) waste sites did not differ systematically from those for non-special sites. For some specific anomalies, higher risks were found in the period before opening compared with after opening of a landfill site, especially hospital admissions for abdominal wall defects.

Conclusions: We found small excess risks of congenital anomalies and low and very low birth weight in populations living near landfill sites. No causal mechanisms are available to explain these findings, and alternative explanations include data artefacts and residual confounding. Further studies are needed to help differentiate between the various possibilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Map of Great Britain showing 2 km zones around landfill sites and reference area
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Digest of environmental statistics. London: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions; 2001.
    1. Ward RS, Williams GM, Hills CC. Changes in major and trace components of landfill gas during subsurface migration. Waste Manage Res. 1996;14:243–261.
    1. Johnson BL, DeRosa C. The toxicologic hazard of superfund hazardous-waste sites. Rev Environ Health. 1997;12:235–251. - PubMed
    1. Hamar GB, McGeehin MA, Phifer BL, Ashley DL. Volatile organic compound testing of a population living near a hazardous waste site. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 1996;6:247–255. - PubMed
    1. El-Fadel M, Findikakis AN, Leckie JO. Environmental impacts of solid waste landfilling. J Environ Manage. 1997;50:1–25.

Publication types