Group B streptococcal disease: from trials and tribulations to triumph and trepidation
- PMID: 11512078
- DOI: 10.1086/322697
Group B streptococcal disease: from trials and tribulations to triumph and trepidation
Abstract
Group B streptococci garnered attention during the 1970s when they surpassed Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus to become the principal causes of sepsis in early infancy. During the 1980s, several clinical trials demonstrated that administration of antimicrobial agents during labor could interrupt vertical transmission and prevent invasive disease in the first week of life (i.e., early-onset disease). However, prophylaxis was not widely used during the next 10 years. On the basis of efforts by clinician-researchers, professional organizations, community-based parent advocacy groups, and the public health community, consensus recommendations for group B streptococcal prophylaxis were finally issued in 1996. By the end of 1999, the incidence of early-onset disease in selected counties within the United States had decreased by 70%, and the gap between black and white persons with disease narrowed by 75%. This recent triumph leaves the professional community treading lightly, alert to the need to monitor for unintended consequences that may threaten recent progress.
Similar articles
-
Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010. PMID: 21088663
-
Early-onset group B Streptococcal sepsis: new recommendations from the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention.Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Jul;97(4):F291-4. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300627. Epub 2011 Nov 4. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012. PMID: 22058178 Review. No abstract available.
-
Combined, selective chemoprophylaxis of early onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease (GBS EOD).Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997;418:267-8. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-1825-3_65. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1997. PMID: 9331649 No abstract available.
-
Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus: has the time come to wait more than 4 hours?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):15-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24315859
-
Consequences of prophylaxis for group B streptococcal infections of the neonate.Semin Perinatol. 2007 Feb;31(1):33-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.01.005. Semin Perinatol. 2007. PMID: 17317425 Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular characterization and lytic activities of Streptococcus agalactiae bacteriophages and determination of lysogenic-strain features.J Bacteriol. 2009 Aug;191(15):4776-85. doi: 10.1128/JB.00426-09. Epub 2009 May 22. J Bacteriol. 2009. PMID: 19465660 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of StrepBSelect Chromogenic Medium and the Fast-Track Diagnostics Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Real-Time PCR Assay Compared to Routine Culture for Detection of GBS during Antepartum Screening.J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):2137-2142. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00043-17. Epub 2017 Apr 26. J Clin Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28446575 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis and early-onset neonatal sepsis patterns.Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2003;11(4):221-6. doi: 10.1080/10647440300025525. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 15108869 Free PMC article.
-
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and macrolide resistance genes of beta-hemolytic streptococci in Korea.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004 Jul;48(7):2716-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2716-2718.2004. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004. PMID: 15215133 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of pre- and intrapartum screening of group B streptococci and adherence to screening guidelines: a cohort study.Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Jun;174(6):827-35. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2548-y. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Eur J Pediatr. 2015. PMID: 25922140
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous