[Gender perspective can result in better research on sex differences and revascularization]
- PMID: 11521331
[Gender perspective can result in better research on sex differences and revascularization]
Abstract
This article focuses on how sex differences in revascularization, PTCA and CABG, are discussed in medical research. We selected and analyzed 10 articles identified through Medline, for the purpose of studying such discussions. Three explanatory models were identified by qualitative analysis: biological, psychosocial and discriminatory. Although the articles focused on sex differences in revascularization, the discussions in the articles on this issue were sparse. We demonstrate how a gender perspective can generate new questions and theories and contribute to a better prognosis for women and men with heart disease.
Similar articles
-
Confusion in coronary revascularization in women: a structured approach to reviewing the data.Cardiol Rev. 2006 Nov-Dec;14(6):303-7. doi: 10.1097/01.crd.0000242108.46825.4b. Cardiol Rev. 2006. PMID: 17053378 Review.
-
Gender bias in cardiology: are women missing out on PTCA?Aust J Adv Nurs. 1994 Sep-Nov;12(1):6-11. Aust J Adv Nurs. 1994. PMID: 7786456
-
Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients.Circulation. 2006 Sep 19;114(12):1251-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.570838. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Circulation. 2006. PMID: 16966588 Clinical Trial.
-
Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.Eur Heart J. 2006 Mar;27(6):671-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi731. Epub 2006 Jan 19. Eur Heart J. 2006. PMID: 16423872
-
Gender differences in the outcome of cardiac interventions.Herz. 2005 Aug;30(5):375-89. doi: 10.1007/s00059-005-2716-3. Herz. 2005. PMID: 16132240 Review. English, German.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical