Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2000 Dec;1(4):173-81.
doi: 10.1023/a:1026595011371.

Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect

D P MacKinnon  1 , J L Krull, C M Lockwood
Affiliations
Review

Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect

D P MacKinnon et al. Prev Sci. 2000 Dec.

Abstract

This paper describes the statistical similarities among mediation, confounding, and suppression. Each is quantified by measuring the change in the relationship between an independent and a dependent variable after adding a third variable to the analysis. Mediation and confounding are identical statistically and can be distinguished only on conceptual grounds. Methods to determine the confidence intervals for confounding and suppression effects are proposed based on methods developed for mediated effects. Although the statistical estimation of effects and standard errors is the same, there are important conceptual differences among the three types of effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A three-variable mediation model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 1980.
    1. Alwin DF, Hauser RM. The decomposition of effects in path analysis. American Sociological Review. 1975;40:37–47.
    1. Aroian LA. The probability function of the product of two normally distributed variables. Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1944;18:265–271.
    1. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;51:1173–1182. - PubMed
    1. Bobko P, Rieck A. Large sample estimators for standard errors of functions of correlation coefficients. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1980;4:385–398.