Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2001 Aug;78(8):589-98.
doi: 10.1097/00006324-200108000-00011.

A comparison of two methods of evaluating cornea-to-contact lens base curve fluorescein patterns in keratoconus

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A comparison of two methods of evaluating cornea-to-contact lens base curve fluorescein patterns in keratoconus

B A Fink et al. Optom Vis Sci. 2001 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: The purposes of the study were as follows: (1) to compare the apical fitting relationship of habitual contact lens fluorescein patterns in keratoconus as determined by clinician assessment of on-eye patterns to those determined by photograph readers looking at slides of fluorescein patterns and (2) to determine the validity of the techniques used in assessing the apical fitting relationships of rigid corneal contact lenses on keratoconic corneas.

Methods: Central fluorescein patterns of rigid contact lens-wearing keratoconus patients enrolled in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study were graded as "definite touch," "touch," "clearance," or "definite clearance" by certified clinicians. Photographs of these patterns were evaluated independently by certified, masked photograph readers using the same grading scale.

Results: Agreement between "re-reads" of the same fluorescein pattern slides by the photograph readers was substantial (weighted kappa = 0.751). Agreement between assessments of habitual fit fluorescein patterns at the baseline vs. the repeat visits was poor for the photograph readers (weighted kappa = 0.254) and moderate for the clinicians (kappa = 0.480). Agreement between clinicians' and photograph readers' assessment of the habitual contact lens fluorescein pattern at the baseline visit was fair (weighted kappa = 0.382).

Conclusions: Repeatability and validity of this technique were fair to excellent. Many factors influence fluorescein pattern interpretation, and improvement of the objective method of fluorescein pattern assessment by photograph readers will require improved methodology that takes these factors into consideration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources