Left-side infant holding: a test of the hemispheric arousal-attentional hypothesis
- PMID: 11527318
- DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2626(01)80056-7
Left-side infant holding: a test of the hemispheric arousal-attentional hypothesis
Abstract
When asked to hold a young infant in their arms, most adults hold on the left side (Harris, 1997). In a prior study, we found the same bias when we asked adults merely to imagine holding an infant in their arms (Harris, Almerigi, & Kirsch, 1999). It has been hypothesized that the left-side bias is the product of right-hemisphere arousal accompanying certain aspects of the act, causing attention to be driven to the contralateral, or left, side of personal space. Left-side holding, whether actual or imagined, thus would be consistent with the direction to which the holder's attention has been endogenously directed. We tested this hypothesis by giving 250 college students the "imagine-holding" task and then, as an independent measure of lateralized hemispheric arousal, a 34-item Chimeric Faces Test (CFT). On the "imagine" test, a significant majority reported a left-side hold, and, on the CFT, left-side holders had a significantly stronger left-hemispace bias than right-side holders, although both left- and right side holders had left-hemispace CFT biases. The results thus support the attentional-arousal hypothesis but indicate that other factors are contributing as well.
Similar articles
-
Why are infants held on the left? A test of the attention hypothesis with a doll, a book, and a bag.Laterality. 2010 Sep;15(5):548-71. doi: 10.1080/13576500903064018. Epub 2009 Aug 4. Laterality. 2010. PMID: 19657952
-
Are only infants held more often on the left? If so, why? Testing the attention-emotion hypothesis with an infant, a vase, and two chimeric tests, one "emotional," one not.Laterality. 2019 Jan;24(1):65-97. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1475482. Epub 2018 May 16. Laterality. 2019. PMID: 29768092
-
The contribution of postural bias to lateral preferences for holding human infants.Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):352-6. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12030466
-
Lateral biases for holding infants: early opinions, observations, and explanations, with some possible lessons for theory and research today.Brain Cogn. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(2-3):392-4. doi: 10.1006/brcg.2001.1384. Brain Cogn. 2002. PMID: 12030474 Review.
-
[Lateralization and interhemispheric integration of directed attention].Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2001 Dec;41(12):1128-30. Rinsho Shinkeigaku. 2001. PMID: 12235816 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Human Lateralization, Maternal Effects and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Mar 22;15:668520. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.668520. eCollection 2021. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33828467 Free PMC article.
-
Characteristics of Resting-State Electroencephalogram Network in α-Band of Table Tennis Athletes.Brain Sci. 2024 Feb 27;14(3):222. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14030222. Brain Sci. 2024. PMID: 38539611 Free PMC article.
-
Received Cradling Bias During the First Year of Life: A Retrospective Study on Children With Typical and Atypical Development.Front Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 27;11:91. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00091. eCollection 2020. Front Psychiatry. 2020. PMID: 32174855 Free PMC article.
-
Facial emotion processing hemispheric bias is weakly associated with handedness, autistic traits and biological sex, but not age.BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 18;13(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02218-2. BMC Psychol. 2025. PMID: 40102897 Free PMC article.
-
Environmental and genetic determinants of sensorimotor asymmetries in mother-infant interaction.Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Dec 5;16:1080141. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.1080141. eCollection 2022. Front Behav Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 36545121 Free PMC article. No abstract available.