Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2001 Aug;25(4):334-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2001.tb00589.x.

Predictors of early rescreening in the National Cervical Screening Program, Australia

Affiliations
Free article

Predictors of early rescreening in the National Cervical Screening Program, Australia

H Mitchell et al. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001 Aug.
Free article

Abstract

Objective: To identify variables that predict early rescreening after a negative Pap smear report.

Methods: Cohort study using the records of a statewide Cervical Cytology Registry in Victoria, Australia. The cohort comprised 31,082 women who had a negative Pap smear report during the first half of 1996 and who were rescreened within the subsequent 36 months. Early rescreening was defined as a further Pap smear within 21 months.

Results: The strongest predictor of early rescreening was a recommendation at the time of issuing the negative Pap smear report by the laboratory for retesting before two years (adjusted odds ratio = 3.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.58-4.05). Mention of reactive or inflammatory change as part of the negative Pap smear report was also a powerful predictor (adjusted odds ratio = 1.67, 95% CI 1.50-1.85). Significant predictors associated with the women were young age, high socio-economic status and residence in the capital city. Significant predictors associated with the practitioner were if either the index or subsequent smear was collected by an obstetrician/ gynaecologist or a hospital-based clinic, or if the practitioner collecting the index smear was a female. The population-attributable risk per cent associated with the laboratory recommendation was 27%.

Conclusions: This data suggests that a multifaceted strategy targeting pathology laboratories, practitioners and women may be needed to reduce early rescreening.

Implications: Early rescreening is wasteful of health resources. New screening programs should be designed to avoid this problem.

PubMed Disclaimer