Use of Norplant implants in the immediate postpartum period among asymptomatic HIV-1-positive mothers
- PMID: 11535212
- DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00216-5
Use of Norplant implants in the immediate postpartum period among asymptomatic HIV-1-positive mothers
Abstract
A prospective cohort study of Norplant use in the immediate postpartum period among asymptomatic HIV-1-positive women was conducted in Bangkok, Thailand. The objectives of this study were to evaluate side effects and menstrual patterns of the Norplant system in this group. A total of 88 asymptomatic HIV-1-positive mothers were recruited for this study. All of them voluntarily accepted the use of the Norplant implant as a contraceptive method immediately postpartum. Their mean age was 24.9 years. Most of them had completed primary school. The follow-up period was 24 weeks. There were eight participants lost from the study because of loss of contact. Irregular bleeding was the most common menstrual pattern in these participants. The major side effects were headache, followed by hair loss. No subject terminated Norplant use during the study period. The Norplant implant appears to be safe and well tolerated in asymptomatic HIV-1-positive parturients when inserted immediately postpartum.
Similar articles
-
Use of Norplant implants in asymptomatic HIV-1 infected women.Contraception. 1997 Apr;55(4):205-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00011-5. Contraception. 1997. PMID: 9179451
-
Use of Norplant contraceptive implants in the immediate postpartum period: safety and tolerance.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jan;172(1 Pt 1):175-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90109-4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7847530 Clinical Trial.
-
Effectiveness of Norplant implants among Thai women in Bangkok.Contraception. 1996 Jan;53(1):33-6. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00261-8. Contraception. 1996. PMID: 8631187 Clinical Trial.
-
Norplant consensus statement and background review.Contraception. 1998 Jan;57(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(97)00200-x. Contraception. 1998. PMID: 9554244 Review.
-
Hormonal implants: contraception for a new century.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;170(5 Pt 2):1536-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)05016-7. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 8178903 Review.
Cited by
-
Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.Drug Saf. 2003;26(5):303-35. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326050-00002. Drug Saf. 2003. PMID: 12650633 Review.
-
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant and IUD for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 27;10(10):CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36302159 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of contraceptive continuation among women living with HIV.Contraception. 2018 Jul;98(1):8-24. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 9. Contraception. 2018. PMID: 29432719 Free PMC article.
-
Immediate versus delayed postpartum insertion of contraceptive implant for contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 22;4(4):CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 27;10:CD011913. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011913.pub3. PMID: 28432791 Free PMC article. Updated.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical