Commentary 2 to Cox and Little: radiation-induced oncogenic transformation: the interplay between dose, dose protraction, and radiation quality
- PMID: 11537507
- DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-035416-0.50012-4
Commentary 2 to Cox and Little: radiation-induced oncogenic transformation: the interplay between dose, dose protraction, and radiation quality
Abstract
There is now a substantial body of evidence for end points such as oncogenic transformation in vitro, and carcinogenesis and life shortening in vivo, suggesting that dose protraction leads to an increase in effectiveness relative to a single, acute exposure--at least for radiations of medium linear energy transfer (LET) such as neutrons. Table I contains a summary of the pertinent data from studies in which the effect is seen. [table: see text] This phenomenon has come to be known as the "inverse dose rate effect," because it is in marked contrast to the situation at low LET, where protraction in delivery of a dose of radiation, either by fractionation or low dose rate, results in a decreased biological effect; additionally, at medium and high LET, for radiobiological end points such as clonogenic survival, the biological effectiveness is independent of protraction. The quantity and quality of the published reports on the "inverse dose rate effect" leaves little doubt that the effect is real, but the available evidence indicates that the magnitude of the effect is due to a complex interplay between dose, dose rate, and radiation quality. Here, we first summarize the available data on the inverse dose rate effect and suggest that it follows a consistent pattern in regard to dose, dose rate, and radiation quality; second, we describe a model that predicts these features; and, finally, we describe the significance of the effect for radiation protection.
Similar articles
-
Dose protraction studies with low- and high-LET radiations on neoplastic cell transformation in vitro.Adv Space Res. 1986;6(11):137-47. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(86)90286-3. Adv Space Res. 1986. PMID: 11537213
-
The potential impact of bystander effects on radiation risks in a Mars mission.Radiat Res. 2001 Nov;156(5 Pt 2):612-7. doi: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0612:tpiobe]2.0.co;2. Radiat Res. 2001. PMID: 11604082
-
Predicting cancer rates in astronauts from animal carcinogenesis studies and cellular markers.Mutat Res. 1999 Dec 6;430(2):255-69. doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(99)00137-2. Mutat Res. 1999. PMID: 10631340
-
Tissue responses to low protracted doses of high LET radiations or photons: early and late damage relevant to radio-protective countermeasures.Adv Space Res. 1989;9(10):299-313. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(89)90453-5. Adv Space Res. 1989. PMID: 11537307 Review.
-
Radiation issues for piloted Mars mission.Adv Space Res. 1992;12(2-3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/0273-1177(92)90108-a. Adv Space Res. 1992. PMID: 11537008 Review.
Cited by
-
A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction.Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jul 7;53(13):R193-241. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/13/R01. Epub 2008 Jun 9. Phys Med Biol. 2008. PMID: 18540047 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing the risk of second malignancies after modern radiotherapy.Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jun;11(6):438-48. doi: 10.1038/nrc3069. Epub 2011 May 19. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21593785 Free PMC article. Review.