Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b
- PMID: 11545154
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1011102628306
Wavelet analysis of P3a and P3b
Abstract
Target/standard discrimination difficulty and the degree of stimulus "novelty" were manipulated systematically in a three-stimulus odd-ball task to assess how these variables affect target and non-target P300 scalp distributions for visual stimuli. Wavelet transformation (WT) analyses were performed on the non-target (P3a) and target (P3b) ERPs to assay how the underlying electroencephalographic (EEG) activity was affected by both the difficulty and novelty factors. When target/standard discrimination was easy, P300 amplitude was higher for the target than the non-target across all electrode sites, and both demonstrated parietal maximums. In contrast, when target/standard discrimination was difficult, non-target amplitude (P3a) was higher and earlier over the frontal/central electrode sites for both levels of novelty, whereas target amplitude (P3b) was greater parietally and occurred later than the non-target components and was generally unaffected by non-target novelty level. The WT analyses indicated that appreciable theta activity was related to the more novel non-target stimuli; primarily target component delta coefficients were affected by the discrimination difficulty variable. The findings suggest that target/standard discrimination difficulty, rather than stimulus novelty, determines P3a generation for visual stimuli but that the underlying theta oscillations are differentially affected by stimulus novelty. WT analysis methods are discussed along with the theoretical and neurophysiological implications of the findings.
Similar articles
-
Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jun 18. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17573239 Free PMC article. Review.
-
P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli.Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Jan;110(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/s0168-5597(98)00033-1. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999. PMID: 10348317
-
P3a from visual stimuli: typicality, task, and topography.Brain Topogr. 2003 Spring;15(3):141-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1022637732495. Brain Topogr. 2003. PMID: 12705810
-
P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Jan;59(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.08.003. Epub 2005 Oct 25. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16253363
-
Neuropsychology and neuropharmacology of P3a and P3b.Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 May;60(2):172-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.12.012. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Int J Psychophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16510201 Review.
Cited by
-
Measurement of cognitive dynamics during video watching through event-related potentials (ERPs) and oscillations (EROs).Cogn Neurodyn. 2019 Dec;13(6):503-512. doi: 10.1007/s11571-019-09544-x. Epub 2019 Jun 20. Cogn Neurodyn. 2019. PMID: 31741687 Free PMC article.
-
The Approach Behavior to Angry Words in Athletes-A Pilot Study.Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun 4;13:117. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00117. eCollection 2019. Front Behav Neurosci. 2019. PMID: 31213996 Free PMC article.
-
Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;118(10):2128-48. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jun 18. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007. PMID: 17573239 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Spatiotemporal dynamics of high-gamma activities during a 3-stimulus visual oddball task.PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059969. Epub 2013 Mar 21. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23555852 Free PMC article.
-
Theta and delta band activity explain N2 and P3 ERP component activity in a go/no-go task.Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jan;125(1):124-32. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.06.025. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014. PMID: 23891195 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous