Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2001:1:2.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-1-2. Epub 2001 Aug 1.

Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study

J M Fortin et al. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2001.

Abstract

Background: Patients increasingly seek more active involvement in health care decisions, but little is known about how to communicate complex risk information to patients. The objective of this study was to elicit patient preferences for the presentation and framing of complex risk information.

Method: To accomplish this, eight focus group discussions and 15 one-on-one interviews were conducted, where women were presented with risk data in a variety of different graphical formats, metrics, and time horizons. Risk data were based on a hypothetical woman's risk for coronary heart disease, hip fracture, and breast cancer, with and without hormone replacement therapy. Participants' preferences were assessed using likert scales, ranking, and abstractions of focus group discussions.

Results: Forty peri- and postmenopausal women were recruited through hospital fliers (n = 25) and a community health fair (n = 15). Mean age was 51 years, 50% were non-Caucasian, and all had completed high school. Bar graphs were preferred by 83% of participants over line graphs, thermometer graphs, 100 representative faces, and survival curves. Lifetime risk estimates were preferred over 10 or 20-year horizons, and absolute risks were preferred over relative risks and number needed to treat.

Conclusion: Although there are many different formats for presenting and framing risk information, simple bar charts depicting absolute lifetime risk were rated and ranked highest overall for patient preferences for format.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graphical Displays of Risk Estimates: Bar Graph and Line Graph
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphical Displays of Risk Estimates: Thermometer Graph, 100 Faces, and Survival Curves
Figure 3
Figure 3
Risk Displays on Multiple Disease Outcomes Over Different Time Horizons, Set A: Each graph shows the risk for one disease over multiple time horizons with and without HRT (1. Coronary Heart Disease, 2. Hip Fracture, 3. Breast Cancer).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Risk Displays on Multiple Disease Outcomes Over Different Time Horizons, Set B: Each graph shows the risk for three diseases over one time horizon with and without HRT (4. Ten-year estimates, 5. Twenty-year estimates, 6. Lifetime estimates).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ranking of Graphical Formats Containing Risk Information

References

    1. Bell RA, Kravitz RL, Wilkes MS. Direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising and the public. JGIM. 1999;14:651–657. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.01049.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mazur DH, Hickam DH. Interpretation of graphic data by patients in a general medicine clinic. JGIM. 1990;5:402–405. - PubMed
    1. Mazur DJ, Merz JF. How the manner of presentation of data influences older patients in determining their treatment preferences. JAGS. 1993;41:223–228. - PubMed
    1. Mazur DJ, Hickam DH. Patients' and physicians' interpretations of graphic data displays. Med Decis Mak. 1993;13:59–63. - PubMed
    1. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM, Black WC, Welch HG. Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: How you ask matters. Med Decis Mak. 1999;19:221–229. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources